Literature DB >> 32631660

Determinants of hospital variability in perioperative red blood cell transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

David C Fitzgerald1, Annie N Simpson2, Robert A Baker3, Xiaoting Wu4, Min Zhang5, Michael P Thompson4, Gaetano Paone6, Alphonse Delucia7, Donald S Likosky4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify to what extent distinguishing patient and procedural characteristics can explain center-level transfusion variation during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
METHODS: Observational cohort study using the Perfusion Measures and Outcomes Registry from 43 adult cardiac surgical programs from July 1, 2011, to July 1, 2017. Iterative multilevel logistic regression models were constructed using patient demographic characteristics, preoperative risk factors, and intraoperative conservation strategies to progressively explain center-level transfusion variation.
RESULTS: Of the 22,272 adult patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass, 7241 (32.5%) received at least 1 U allogeneic red blood cells (range, 10.9%-59.9%). When compared with patients who were not transfused, patients who received at least 1 U red blood cells were older (68 vs 64 years; P < .001), were women (41.5% vs 15.9%; P < .001), and had a lower body surface area (1.93 m2 vs 2.07 m2; P < .001), respectively. Among the models explaining center-level transfusion variability, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.07 for model 1 (random intercepts), 0.12 for model 2 (patient factors), 0.14 for model 3 (intraoperative factors), and 0.11 for model 4 (combined). The coefficient of variation for center-level transfusion rates were 0.31, 0.29, 0.40, and 0.30 for models 1 through 4, respectively. The majority of center-level variation could not be explained through models containing both patient and intraoperative factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that variation in center-level red blood cells transfusion cannot be explained by patient and procedural factors alone. Investigating organizational culture and programmatic infrastructure may be necessary to better understand variation in transfusion practices.
Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood loss/surgical; bypass/cardiopulmonary; cardiac surgical procedures; coronary artery bypass; erythrocyte transfusions; perioperative care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32631660      PMCID: PMC7959104          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  41 in total

1.  Organizational Contributors to the Variation in Red Blood Cell Transfusion Practices in Cardiac Surgery: Survey Results From the State of Michigan.

Authors:  Anton Camaj; Darin B Zahuranec; Gaetano Paone; Barbara R Benedetti; Warren D Behr; Marc A Zimmerman; Min Zhang; Robert S Kramer; Jason Penn; Patricia F Theurer; Theron A Paugh; Milo Engoren; Alphonse DeLucia; Richard L Prager; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Anticipation, teamwork and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Sexton; Amanda Johnson; Amanda Gotsch; Ahmed A Hussein; Lora Cavuoto; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  A Canadian survey of transfusion practices in critically ill patients. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

Authors:  P C Hébert; G Wells; C Martin; M Tweeddale; J Marshall; M Blajchman; G Pagliarello; I Schweitzer; L Calder
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ludhmila A Hajjar; Jean-Louis Vincent; Filomena R B G Galas; Rosana E Nakamura; Carolina M P Silva; Marilia H Santos; Julia Fukushima; Roberto Kalil Filho; Denise B Sierra; Neuza H Lopes; Thais Mauad; Aretusa C Roquim; Marcia R Sundin; Wanderson C Leão; Juliano P Almeida; Pablo M Pomerantzeff; Luis O Dallan; Fabio B Jatene; Noedir A G Stolf; Jose O C Auler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Brenda J Grossman; Steven Kleinman; Alan T Tinmouth; Marisa B Marques; Mark K Fung; John B Holcomb; Orieji Illoh; Lewis J Kaplan; Louis M Katz; Sunil V Rao; John D Roback; Aryeh Shander; Aaron A R Tobian; Robert Weinstein; Lisa Grace Swinton McLaughlin; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Impact of institutional culture on rates of transfusions during cardiovascular procedures: The Michigan experience.

Authors:  Donald S Likosky; Min Zhang; Gaetano Paone; John Collins; Alphonse DeLucia; Theodore Schreiber; Patty Theurer; Samer Kazziha; Dale Leffler; Douglas J Wunderly; Hitinder S Gurm; Richard L Prager
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Impact of guideline implementation on transfusion practices in a surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jacob T Gutsche; Zev Noah Kornfield; Rebecca M Speck; Prakash A Patel; Pavan Atluri; John G Augoustides
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Variation in transfusion rates within a single institution: exploring the effect of differing practice patterns on the likelihood of blood product transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Claudia Cote; Jeffrey B MacLeod; Alexandra M Yip; Maral Ouzounian; Craig D Brown; Rand Forgie; Marc P Pelletier; Ansar Hassan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Risk factors for red cell transfusion in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  N Shehata; G Naglie; A A Alghamdi; J Callum; C D Mazer; P Hebert; D Streiner; K Wilson
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.144

10.  Drug, devices, technologies, and techniques for blood management in minimally invasive and conventional cardiothoracic surgery: a consensus statement from the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2011.

Authors:  Alan H Menkis; Janet Martin; Davy C H Cheng; David C Fitzgerald; John J Freedman; Changqing Gao; Andreas Koster; G Scott Mackenzie; Gavin J Murphy; Bruce Spiess; Niv Ad
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

1.  Commentary: Culture trumps (transfusion) guidelines.

Authors:  Christopher T Ryan; Todd K Rosengart
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.209

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.