| Literature DB >> 28689183 |
Miklos Marosfoi1, Frederic Clarencon2, Erin T Langan1, Robert M King1, Olivia W Brooks1, Takamisu Tamura1, John M Wainwright3, Matthew J Gounis1, Srinivasan Vedantham4, Ajit S Puri1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Thromboembolic complications remain a limitation of flow diverting stents. We hypothesize that phosphorilcholine surface modified flow diverters (Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology, sPED) would have less acute thrombus formation on the device surface compared with the classic Pipeline Embolization device (cPED).Entities:
Keywords: dual antiplatelet therapy; flow diverters; intracranial aneurysms; optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28689183 PMCID: PMC5869458 DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurointerv Surg ISSN: 1759-8478 Impact factor: 5.836
Figure 1Anatomical locations for scoring thrombus formation. Summation of the number of locations with clot appreciated on the surface of the device resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 3. DV, distal to vertebral artery; DA&PV, distal to the aneurysm and proximal to the vertebral artery; PA, proximal to aneurysm.
Baseline characteristics of the aneurysm, parent vessel dimensions, platelet function, and the devices deployed
| cPED | sPED | p Value | |||
| No DAPT | DAPT | No DAPT | DAPT | ||
| Aneurysm neck size (mm) | 4.1±1.3 | 3.8±0.7 | 3.9±1.0 | 4.3±1.8 | 0.78 |
| Aneurysm width (mm) | 3.8±0.9 | 3.3±0.8 | 3.8±0.9 | 3.4±1.0 | 0.51 |
| Aneurysm height (mm) | 7.7±2.2 | 6.3±1.2 | 7.6±2.5 | 7.7±2.3 | 0.33 |
| Parent vessel diameter proximal to aneurysm (mm) | 3.7±0.3 | 4.0±0.6 | 3.6±0.4 | 3.9±0.4 | 0.18 |
| Parent vessel diameter distal to aneurysm (mm) | 3.7±0.8 | 3.6±0.4 | 3.5±0.5 | 3.9±0.8 | 0.58 |
| Subclavian artery diameter (mm) | 2.2±0.2 | 2.3±0.3 | 2.2±0.3 | 2.4±0.4 | 0.30 |
| PRU | 261±48 | 56±26 | 249±52 | 84±26 | <0.0001 |
| ARU | 661±6 | 642±43 | 636±57 | 657±12 | 0.90 |
| Device diameter (mm) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.125 | 0.58 |
| Proximal landing zone | NS | ||||
| Innominate artery | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |
| Herniation into aorta | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
All quantities expressed as mean±SD, except device diameters (median) and proximal landing zone (number of animals).
ARU, aspirin reaction units; cPED, classic Pipeline Embolization Device; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; PRU, P2Y12 reaction units; sPED, Pipeline Flex with Shield Technology.
Figure 2Frequency of clot scores in each group. (A) Immediately after angioplasty during the implant procedure there is a significant reduction in the number of locations with visible clot on optical coherence tomography (OCT) for the Shield Pipeline Embolization Device (sPED) and no appreciable difference as a function of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). (B) Immediately after angioplasty following device implantation the frequency of clots forming along the surface of the device covering the ostia of side branch arteries (SB) is reduced with the new generation flow diverter (sPED) and did not change as a function of DAPT.
Figure 3Following the implant and angioplasty of a classic Pipeline embolization device in an animal not receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, significant thrombus accumulation is seen distal to the aneurysm (A, arrow) that is not observed on standard digital subtraction angiography (B). In another animal of the same group, thrombus developed over a covered side branch (C, arrow) without filling deficit on angiography (D). Angiography shows a filling deficit downstream from the device (D, arrow).