PURPOSE: Determination of the amount of variation in conventional acetabular cup positioning (radiological inclination and anteversion) in view of different factors that could influence the measured angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intended acetabular cup position of 45 degrees inclination and 20 degrees anteversion was checked radiologically in 950 patients who received a cementless total hip replacement. The qualifications of the surgeon, operated side and implant model were recorded and analyzed with respect to a possible correlation with the results. Since a "safe angle" cannot be defined without consideration of other variables, a tolerable deviation of the target position was investigated. RESULTS: The mean inclination angle was 48.7 degrees (SD 7 degrees, minimum 28 degrees, maximum 75 degrees ). Anteversion was measured with a mean of 18.6 degrees (SD 9 degrees, minimum -9 degrees, maximum 50 degrees ). Assuming an acceptable deviation of +/- 5 degrees from the target position (45 degrees inclination and 20 degrees anteversion), only 22.7 % of the acetabular cups were in this range. In the case of an acceptable deviation of +/- 10 degrees, 34.5 % of the cups were still outside of the acceptable range. The qualifications of the surgeon, the implanted model, as well as the operated side did not have a significant influence on the results. CONCLUSION: The common implantation technique yielded significant variation with respect to anteversion and inclination. The application of computer-aided navigation in the placement of acetabular cups would help to improve accuracy and reproducibility considerably in total hip arthroplasty.
PURPOSE: Determination of the amount of variation in conventional acetabular cup positioning (radiological inclination and anteversion) in view of different factors that could influence the measured angles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intended acetabular cup position of 45 degrees inclination and 20 degrees anteversion was checked radiologically in 950 patients who received a cementless total hip replacement. The qualifications of the surgeon, operated side and implant model were recorded and analyzed with respect to a possible correlation with the results. Since a "safe angle" cannot be defined without consideration of other variables, a tolerable deviation of the target position was investigated. RESULTS: The mean inclination angle was 48.7 degrees (SD 7 degrees, minimum 28 degrees, maximum 75 degrees ). Anteversion was measured with a mean of 18.6 degrees (SD 9 degrees, minimum -9 degrees, maximum 50 degrees ). Assuming an acceptable deviation of +/- 5 degrees from the target position (45 degrees inclination and 20 degrees anteversion), only 22.7 % of the acetabular cups were in this range. In the case of an acceptable deviation of +/- 10 degrees, 34.5 % of the cups were still outside of the acceptable range. The qualifications of the surgeon, the implanted model, as well as the operated side did not have a significant influence on the results. CONCLUSION: The common implantation technique yielded significant variation with respect to anteversion and inclination. The application of computer-aided navigation in the placement of acetabular cups would help to improve accuracy and reproducibility considerably in total hip arthroplasty.
Authors: Mark C Callanan; Bryan Jarrett; Charles R Bragdon; David Zurakowski; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Johannes Beckmann; Dirk Stengel; Markus Tingart; Jürgen Götz; Joachim Grifka; Christian Lüring Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.717