Literature DB >> 28684261

Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders.

Michael Hollenstein1, Philip Thwaites1, Simon Bütikofer1, Henriette Heinrich1, Matthias Sauter1, Irina Ulmer1, Daniel Pohl1, Daphne Ang2, Daniel Eberli3, Werner Schwizer1, Michael Fried1, Oliver Distler4, Mark Fox5, Benjamin Misselwitz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The factors that determine how people eat when they are healthy or have disease have not been defined. We used high resolution manometry (HRM) to assess pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during ingestion of a solid test meal (STM) in healthy volunteers and patients with motility disorders.
METHODS: This study was based at University Hospital Zurich (Zürich, Switzerland). Healthy volunteers who responded to an advertisement completed HRM with ten single water swallows (SWS) in recumbent and upright positions followed by a 200 g rice STM in the upright position. Healthy volunteers were stratified for age and sex to ensure a representative population. For comparison, consecutive patients with major motility disorders on SWS and patients with dysphagia but no major motility disorders on SWS (disease controls) were selected from a database that was assembled prospectively; the rice meal data were analysed retrospectively. During STM, pharyngeal swallows were timed and oesophageal contractions were classified as representing normal motility or different types of abnormal motility in accordance with established metrics. Factors that could potentially be associated with eating speed were investigated, including age, sex, body-mass index, and presence of motility disorder. We compared diagnoses based on SWS findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification v3.0, with those based on STM findings, assessed with the Chicago Classification adapted for solids. These studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT02407938 and NCT02397616.
FINDINGS: Between April 2, 2014, and May 13, 2015, 72 healthy volunteers were recruited and underwent HRM. Additionally, we analysed data from 54 consecutive patients with major motility disorders and 53 with dysphagia but no major motility disorders recruited between April 2, 2013, and Dec 18, 2014. We found important variations in oesophageal motility and eating speed during meal ingestion in healthy volunteers and patients. Increased time between swallows was accompanied by more effective oesophageal contractions (in healthy volunteers, 20/389 [5%] effective swallows at <4 s between swallows vs 586/900 [65%] effective swallows at >11 s between swallows, p<0·0001). Obstructive, spastic, or hypercontractile swallows were rare in healthy volunteers (total <1%). Patients with motility disorders ate slower than healthy volunteers (14·95 g [IQR 11-25] per min vs 32·9 g [25-40] per min, p<0·0001) and pathological oesophageal motility were reproduced when patients consumed the STM. In healthy volunteers, eating speed was associated only with frequency of swallows (slope 2·5 g per min per pharyngeal swallow per min [95% CI 1·1-4·0], p=0·0009), whereas in patients with dysphagia, it was correlated with frequency of effective oesophageal contractions (6·4 g per min per effective contraction per min [4·3-8·5], p<0·0001). Diagnostic agreement was good between the HRM with SWS and rice STM (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0·81, 95% CI 0·74-0·87, p<0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: Our results show normative values for pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility in healthy volunteers. Detailed analysis of HRM data acquired during an STM shows that the rate-limiting factor for intake of solids in health is the frequency of pharyngeal swallowing and not oesophageal contractility. The reverse is true in patients with oesophageal motility disorders, in whom the frequency of effective oesophageal contractions determines eating speed. FUNDING: University Hospital Zurich.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28684261     DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30151-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


  17 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

2.  Functional Diagnosis in Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Diseases: Relevance for Conservative, Interdisciplinary and Surgical Therapies.

Authors:  Mark Fox; Henriette Heinrich; Silvana Perretta; Daniel Steinemann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 3.  Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction: Current Approach to Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Thomas A Zikos; George Triadafilopoulos; John O Clarke
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  UEG Week 2020 Poster Presentations.

Authors: 
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 5.  Minor esophageal functional disorders: are they relevant?

Authors:  Ryan A Balko; Don C Codipilly; Karthik Ravi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-17

Review 6.  Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Daniel Sifrim; Dustin A Carlson; Mary Hawn; David A Katzka; John E Pandolfino; Roberto Penagini; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Roger Tatum; Michel Vaezi; John O Clarke; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 8.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility.

Authors:  Mark R Fox; Rami Sweis; Rena Yadlapati; John Pandolfino; Albis Hani; Claudia Defilippi; Tack Jan; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.

Authors:  Mohd Ridzuan Mohd Said; Zhiqin Wong; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Chai Soon Ngiu; Raja Affendi Raja Ali; Yeong Yeh Lee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.