Literature DB >> 15540285

Transverse coloplasty pouch after total mesorectal excision: functional assessment of evacuation.

Jörg S Köninger1, Michael Butters, Jens D Redecke, Kaspar Z'graggen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colon pouch reconstruction after total mesorectal excision is functionally superior to straight colorectal/ anal anastomosis. In the long-term, stool evacuation difficulties could jeopardize the functional benefit. The transverse coloplasty pouch presents an alternative to the standard J-pouch. This study was designed to analyze functional outcome and defecography findings after total mesorectal excision and transverse coloplasty pouch reconstruction.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with cancer of the middle and lower third of the rectum underwent a total mesorectal excision and were examined in a prospective study. In all patients, reconstruction was performed with a transverse coloplasty pouch. Pouch and anastomosis were checked by Gastrografin enema postoperatively. Patients were examined within eight months by means of defecography, manometry, pouch volumetry, and a standardized continence questionnaire.
RESULTS: Total mesorectal excision with transverse coloplasty pouch anastomosis was performed successfully in all patients. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage was observed in 2 of 30 patients and the radiologic leak rate was 4 of 30. All patients evacuated the pouch completely; none needed enemas or suppositories to facilitate defecation. Twenty-five of 27 patients had a maximum of three bowel movements per day, and all patients were continent for solid stools. Patients with abnormal findings on defecography proved more likely to have anal dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Transverse coloplasty pouch reconstruction after total mesorectal excision leads to good functional results and is not associated with stool evacuation problems. Urgency and incontinence correlate rather with impaired pelvic floor movement than with pouch size or anal sphincter tonus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15540285     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0671-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  The transverse coloplasty pouch is technically easy and safe and improves functional outcomes after low rectal cancer resection-a single center experience with 397 patients.

Authors:  Stefan Fritz; René Hennig; Christine Kantas; Hansjörg Killguss; André Schaudt; Katharina Feilhauer; Jörg Köninger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Taeniectomy pouch as neorectum after low rectal resection.

Authors:  A Farag; A N Mashhour; M Y Elbarmelgi; M M Raslan; A M Abdelsalam; A A Mohsen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Taeniectomy Versus Transverse Coloplasty as Neorectum After Low Rectal Resection.

Authors:  Ahmed Farag; Abdrabou N Mashhour; Mohamed Yehia Elbarmelgi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Y Ziv; A Zbar; Y Bar-Shavit; I Igov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Modified transverse coloplasty pouch: new reconstruction techniques after total mesorectal excision. Our experience.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; Chiara Eberspacher; A M Romani; D Merletti; A Maturo; S Pontone; D Pironi
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  The transverse coloplasty pouch.

Authors:  A Ulrich; K Z'graggen; H Schmitz-Winnenthal; J Weitz; M W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Victor W Fazio; Massarat Zutshi; Feza H Remzi; Yann Parc; Reinhard Ruppert; Alois Fürst; James Celebrezze; Susan Galanduik; Guy Orangio; Neil Hyman; Leslie Bokey; Emmanuel Tiret; Boris Kirchdorfer; David Medich; Marcus Tietze; Tracy Hull; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Laxatives for the management of constipation in people receiving palliative care.

Authors:  Bridget Candy; Louise Jones; Philip J Larkin; Victoria Vickerstaff; Adrian Tookman; Patrick Stone
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-13

9.  Coloplasty Neorectum versus Straight Anastomosis in Low Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Fazl Q Parray; Javaid A Magray; Manzoor Ahmad Dar; Nisar A Chowdri; Rauf A Wani; Natasha Thakur
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2014-01-30

10.  Faecal and urinary incontinence after multimodality treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marilyne M Lange; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.