Literature DB >> 8837773

Disruption of auditory spatial working memory by inactivation of the forebrain archistriatum in barn owls.

E I Knudsen1, P F Knudsen.   

Abstract

Barn owls not only localize auditory stimuli with great accuracy, they also remember the locations of auditory stimuli and can use this remembered spatial information to guide their flight and strike. Although the mechanisms of sound localization have been studied extensively, the neurobiological basis of auditory spatial memory has not. Here we show that the ability of barn owls to orient their gaze towards and fly to the remembered location of auditory targets is lost during pharmacological inactivation of a small region in the forebrain, the anterior archistriatum. In contrast, archistriatal inactivation has no effect on stimulus-guided responses to auditory targets. The memory-dependent deficit is evident only for acoustic events that occur in the hemifield contralateral to the side that is inactivated. The data demonstrate that in the avian archistriatum, as in the mammalian frontal cortex, there exists a region that is essential for the expression of spatial working memory and that, in the barn owl, this region encodes auditory spatial memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8837773     DOI: 10.1038/383428a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  23 in total

1.  Early visual experience shapes the representation of auditory space in the forebrain gaze fields of the barn owl.

Authors:  G L Miller; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Traces of learning in the auditory localization pathway.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; W Zheng; W M DeBello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Songbirds and the revised avian brain nomenclature.

Authors:  Anton Reiner; David J Perkel; Claudio V Mello; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Comparison of midbrain and thalamic space-specific neurons in barn owls.

Authors:  María Lucía Pérez; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Top-down gain control of the auditory space map by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Top-down control of multimodal sensitivity in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  Daniel E Winkowski; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Cholinergic control of gamma power in the midbrain spatial attention network.

Authors:  Astra S Bryant; C Alex Goddard; John R Huguenard; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Adaptive plasticity in the auditory thalamus of juvenile barn owls.

Authors:  Greg L Miller; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.