Literature DB >> 32805108

Boosting Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations with GPU-Accelerated NAMD.

Haochuan Chen1,2, Julio D C Maia1, Brian K Radak1, David J Hardy1, Wensheng Cai2, Christophe Chipot1,3,4, Emad Tajkhorshid1,5.   

Abstract

Harnessing the power of graphics processing units (GPUs) to accelerate molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in the context of free-energy calculations has been a longstanding effort toward the development of versatile, high-performance MD engines. We report a new GPU-based implementation in NAMD of free-energy perturbation (FEP), one of the oldest, most popular importance-sampling approaches for the determination of free-energy differences that underlie alchemical transformations. Compared to the CPU implementation available since 2001 in NAMD, our benchmarks indicate that the new implementation of FEP in traditional GPU code is about four times faster, without any noticeable loss of accuracy, thereby paving the way toward more affordable free-energy calculations on large biological objects. Moreover, we have extended this new FEP implementation to a code path highly optimized for a single-GPU node, which proves to be up to nearly 30 times faster than the CPU implementation. Through optimized GPU performance, the present developments provide the community with a cost-effective solution for conducting FEP calculations. The new FEP-enabled code has been released with NAMD 3.0.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32805108      PMCID: PMC7686227          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  26 in total

1.  Improving the efficiency and reliability of free energy perturbation calculations using overlap sampling methods.

Authors:  Nandou Lu; David A Kofke; Thomas B Woolf
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Perspective on Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations for Chemical Equilibria.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Laura L Thomas
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Predicting Activity Cliffs with Free-Energy Perturbation.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Benito; Nil Casajuana-Martin; Mireia Jiménez-Rosés; Herman van Vlijmen; Gary Tresadern
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; David S Cerutti; Dan Mermelstein; Charles Lin; Scott LeGrand; Timothy J Giese; Adrian Roitberg; David A Case; Ross C Walker; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Hidden thermodynamics of mutant proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis.

Authors:  J Gao; K Kuczera; B Tidor; M Karplus
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Theoretical calculation of relative binding affinity in host-guest systems.

Authors:  T P Lybrand; J A McCammon; G Wipff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.

Authors:  James C Phillips; David J Hardy; Julio D C Maia; John E Stone; João V Ribeiro; Rafael C Bernardi; Ronak Buch; Giacomo Fiorin; Jérôme Hénin; Wei Jiang; Ryan McGreevy; Marcelo C R Melo; Brian K Radak; Robert D Skeel; Abhishek Singharoy; Yi Wang; Benoît Roux; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Zaida Luthey-Schulten; Laxmikant V Kalé; Klaus Schulten; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Standard binding free energies from computer simulations: What is the best strategy?

Authors:  James C Gumbart; Benoît Roux; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Systematic mutational analysis of peptide inhibition of the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions.

Authors:  Chong Li; Marzena Pazgier; Changqing Li; Weirong Yuan; Min Liu; Gang Wei; Wei-Yue Lu; Wuyuan Lu
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  9 in total

1.  Molecular mechanism of prestin electromotive signal amplification.

Authors:  Jingpeng Ge; Johannes Elferich; Sepehr Dehghani-Ghahnaviyeh; Zhiyu Zhao; Marc Meadows; Henrique von Gersdorff; Emad Tajkhorshid; Eric Gouaux
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 66.850

2.  In Silico Screening of Natural Compounds for Candidates 5HT6 Receptor Antagonists against Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Tijana Bojić; Milan Sencanski; Vladimir Perovic; Jelena Milicevic; Sanja Glisic
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Defining the Energetic Basis for a Conformational Switch Mediating Ligand-Independent Activation of Mutant Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher G Mayne; Weiyi Toy; Kathryn E Carlson; Trusha Bhatt; Sean W Fanning; Geoffrey L Greene; Benita S Katzenellenbogen; Sarat Chandarlapaty; John A Katzenellenbogen; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 4.  Accurate determination of protein:ligand standard binding free energies from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Haohao Fu; Haochuan Chen; Marharyta Blazhynska; Emma Goulard Coderc de Lacam; Florence Szczepaniak; Anna Pavlova; Xueguang Shao; James C Gumbart; François Dehez; Benoît Roux; Wensheng Cai; Christophe Chipot
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 17.021

5.  Inhibitor binding influences the protonation states of histidines in SARS-CoV-2 main protease.

Authors:  Anna Pavlova; Diane L Lynch; Isabella Daidone; Laura Zanetti-Polzi; Micholas Dean Smith; Chris Chipot; Daniel W Kneller; Andrey Kovalevsky; Leighton Coates; Andrei A Golosov; Callum J Dickson; Camilo Velez-Vega; José S Duca; Josh V Vermaas; Yui Tik Pang; Atanu Acharya; Jerry M Parks; Jeremy C Smith; James C Gumbart
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Alchemical free energy simulations without speed limits. A generic framework to calculate free energy differences independent of the underlying molecular dynamics program.

Authors:  Marcus Wieder; Markus Fleck; Benedict Braunsfeld; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.672

7.  Elucidating the enhanced binding affinity of a double mutant SP-D with trimannose on the influenza A virus using molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Deng Li; Mona S Minkara
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.155

8.  Generalizing the Discrete Gibbs Sampler-Based λ-Dynamics Approach for Multisite Sampling of Many Ligands.

Authors:  Jonah Z Vilseck; Xinqiang Ding; Ryan L Hayes; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Rapid and accurate estimation of protein-ligand relative binding affinities using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation.

Authors:  Himanshu Goel; Anthony Hazel; Vincent D Ustach; Sunhwan Jo; Wenbo Yu; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 9.825

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.