Christian Ottow1, Ronald Schulz2, Heidi Pfeiffer2, Walter Heindel3, Andreas Schmeling2, Volker Vieth3,4. 1. Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany. christian.ottow@ukmuenster.de. 2. Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Röntgenstraße 23, Münster, 48149, Germany. 3. Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany. 4. Clinic for Radiology, Klinikum Ibbenbüren, Grosse Straße 41, Ibbenbüren, 49477, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relevance of the bony fusion of the distal femoral and the proximal tibial epiphyses by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a prospective cross-sectional cohort study was performed with a special focus on a reliable determination of the 14th, 16th and 18th years of life. METHODS: We scanned 658 German volunteers in the age bracket 12-24 years using a 3.0 T MR-scanner and utilising a T1 turbo spin-echo sequence representing true bone anatomy. Minimum, maximum, mean ± standard deviation and median with lower and upper quartiles were defined. Intra- and interobserver agreements were determined (Cohen's kappa). The statistical relevance of sex-related differences was analysed (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05, exact, two-sided). RESULTS: The bony fusion took place before the 18th year of life in both epiphyses. The Mann-Whitney U test results imply significant sex-related differences for most stages. For both epiphyses, the intra observer (κ femur 0.961; tibia 0.971) and interobserver (κ femur 0.941; tibia 0.951) agreement levels were very good. CONCLUSION: The 14th and the 16th years of life can be determined in both sexes, but the completion of the 18th year of life cannot solely be determined by the bony fusion, as depicted by closest-to-bone MRI. KEY POINTS: • Forensic age estimation by means of MRI of the knee is feasible. • MRI provides data about the ossification process without using ionising radiation. • The method allows the determination of the 14th and 16th years of life. • The bony fusion is not suitable as the sole indicator of majority. • The chosen classification is easy to use for specially trained professional personnel.
OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relevance of the bony fusion of the distal femoral and the proximal tibial epiphyses by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a prospective cross-sectional cohort study was performed with a special focus on a reliable determination of the 14th, 16th and 18th years of life. METHODS: We scanned 658 German volunteers in the age bracket 12-24 years using a 3.0 T MR-scanner and utilising a T1 turbo spin-echo sequence representing true bone anatomy. Minimum, maximum, mean ± standard deviation and median with lower and upper quartiles were defined. Intra- and interobserver agreements were determined (Cohen's kappa). The statistical relevance of sex-related differences was analysed (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05, exact, two-sided). RESULTS: The bony fusion took place before the 18th year of life in both epiphyses. The Mann-Whitney U test results imply significant sex-related differences for most stages. For both epiphyses, the intra observer (κ femur 0.961; tibia 0.971) and interobserver (κ femur 0.941; tibia 0.951) agreement levels were very good. CONCLUSION: The 14th and the 16th years of life can be determined in both sexes, but the completion of the 18th year of life cannot solely be determined by the bony fusion, as depicted by closest-to-bone MRI. KEY POINTS: • Forensic age estimation by means of MRI of the knee is feasible. • MRI provides data about the ossification process without using ionising radiation. • The method allows the determination of the 14th and 16th years of life. • The bony fusion is not suitable as the sole indicator of majority. • The chosen classification is easy to use for specially trained professional personnel.
Keywords:
Age estimation; Forensic age diagnostics; Knee; MRI; Ossification process
Authors: Manuel Kellinghaus; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Heidi Pfeiffer; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: E Hillewig; J Degroote; T Van der Paelt; A Visscher; P Vandemaele; B Lutin; L D'Hooghe; V Vandriessche; M Piette; K Verstraete Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Andreas Schmeling; Ronald Schulz; Walter Reisinger; Matthias Mühler; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Gunther Geserick Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2003-10-08 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Sven Schmidt; Matthias Mühler; Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Ronald Schulz Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 2.791
Authors: Jannick De Tobel; Elke Hillewig; Michiel Bart de Haas; Bram Van Eeckhout; Steffen Fieuws; Patrick Werner Thevissen; Koenraad Luc Verstraete Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Volker Vieth; Ronald Schulz; Walter Heindel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Boris Buerke; Andreas Schmeling; Christian Ottow Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ola Ft Kvist; Ana Luiza Dallora; Ola Nilsson; Peter Anderberg; Johan Sanmartin Berglund; Carl-Erik Flodmark; Sandra Diaz Journal: Acta Radiol Open Date: 2020-09-30
Authors: Markus Auf der Mauer; Eilin Jopp-van Well; Jochen Herrmann; Michael Groth; Michael M Morlock; Rainer Maas; Dennis Säring Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 2.686