Sara Tangmose1, Karl Erik Jensen2, Chiara Villa3, Niels Lynnerup4. 1. Section of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Electronic address: saral@sund.ku.dk. 2. Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. 3. Section of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Electronic address: Chiara.villa@forensic.ku.dk. 4. Section of Forensic Pathology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V Vej 11, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Electronic address: Nly@sund.ku.dk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As forensic age estimations in the living are performed without medical indication, there is a need for the development of non-ionizing methods. This study investigates the use of 1.0T MRI to visualize the ossification status of the medial end of the clavicle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: T2 weighted 3D images were collected from a 1.0T MR system. We prospectively scanned 102 subjects, 47 autopsy cases and 55 living volunteers (12-33 years). Images were scored in blind trials by three observers using a 4-stage system. Observers differed by level of training and radiological expertise. RESULTS: Motion artefacts reduced image resolution in living subjects. However, mean age at stage 4 was significantly different from mean age at stage 2 and 3. The minimum age at stage 4 was 19.8 years. Inter-observer agreement was moderate for autopsy cases and slight for living subjects. By contrasting subjects of "incomplete fusion" (≤ stage 3 on both sides) against "fused" (at least one stage 4), agreement rate rose to moderate (K=0.414) for living subjects. Despite the low agreement rate, no subject younger than 18 years was assessed as having "fused" clavicles. CONCLUSION: At lower image resolution, a 2-stage system increases agreements rates among observers. To further increase accuracy, clavicle staging needs to be performed by trained observers. If available, a 1.0T MR system may be used for age estimation in the living. However, further studies are needed to ensure that the ability to discriminate adults from minors, i.e. 18 years, is maintained.
OBJECTIVES: As forensic age estimations in the living are performed without medical indication, there is a need for the development of non-ionizing methods. This study investigates the use of 1.0T MRI to visualize the ossification status of the medial end of the clavicle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: T2 weighted 3D images were collected from a 1.0T MR system. We prospectively scanned 102 subjects, 47 autopsy cases and 55 living volunteers (12-33 years). Images were scored in blind trials by three observers using a 4-stage system. Observers differed by level of training and radiological expertise. RESULTS: Motion artefacts reduced image resolution in living subjects. However, mean age at stage 4 was significantly different from mean age at stage 2 and 3. The minimum age at stage 4 was 19.8 years. Inter-observer agreement was moderate for autopsy cases and slight for living subjects. By contrasting subjects of "incomplete fusion" (≤ stage 3 on both sides) against "fused" (at least one stage 4), agreement rate rose to moderate (K=0.414) for living subjects. Despite the low agreement rate, no subject younger than 18 years was assessed as having "fused" clavicles. CONCLUSION: At lower image resolution, a 2-stage system increases agreements rates among observers. To further increase accuracy, clavicle staging needs to be performed by trained observers. If available, a 1.0T MR system may be used for age estimation in the living. However, further studies are needed to ensure that the ability to discriminate adults from minors, i.e. 18 years, is maintained.
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Christian Ottow; Ronald Schulz; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Philipp Scharte; Volker Vieth; Ronald Schulz; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Bajanowski; Heidi Pfeiffer; Andreas Schmeling; Sven Schmidt; Daniel Wittschieber Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Christian Ottow; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Ronald Schulz; Juan Hassu; Thomas Bajanowski; Klaus Püschel; Frank Ramsthaler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Jan Alexander Krämer; Sven Schmidt; Kai-Uwe Jürgens; Markus Lentschig; Andreas Schmeling; Volker Vieth Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: S Schmidt; C A Henke; D Wittschieber; V Vieth; T Bajanowski; F Ramsthaler; K Püschel; H Pfeiffer; A Schmeling; R Schulz Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.686