OBJECTIVES: The development of the sternal extremity of the clavicle was examined prospectively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for forensic bone age assessment. The objectives were to examine whether these results were comparable with the literature on plain radiography and CT, to provide age prediction intervals that correctly reflect the high variability in clavicular growth among individuals and to investigate whether MRI of the clavicle can be used to differentiate between individuals younger or older than 18 years. METHODS: The clavicles of 220 volunteers (16-26 years) were examined with 3-T MRI and evaluated according to the Schmeling and Kreitner classification (Schmeling, Int J Legal Med 118:5-8, 2004; Kreitner, Eur Radiol 8:1116-1122, 1998). An additional hand/wrist radiograph was taken and evaluated according to Greulich and Pyle (1959). After a descriptive analysis, a multivariate ordinal regression model was fitted and embedded in a Bayesian framework based on Thevissen et al. (Int J Legal Med 124:35-42, 2009). RESULTS: The descriptive results were concordant with the literature, although the Kreitner classification is recommended and simultaneous evaluation of the hand is considered a basic requirement (Schmeling, Int J Legal Med 118:5-8, 2004). The 95 % credibility interval for both genders with bilateral stage IV is 20-26 years. The corresponding estimated probability of being younger than 18 years is 0.8 % in females and 0.2 % in males. CONCLUSION: MRI of the sternal extremity of the clavicle can be used to differentiate between being younger or older than 18, but a simultaneous evaluation of the hand/wrist is essential. Future evaluation of the predictive performance of the model, using comparable but larger reference samples, is necessary to validate these results.
OBJECTIVES: The development of the sternal extremity of the clavicle was examined prospectively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for forensic bone age assessment. The objectives were to examine whether these results were comparable with the literature on plain radiography and CT, to provide age prediction intervals that correctly reflect the high variability in clavicular growth among individuals and to investigate whether MRI of the clavicle can be used to differentiate between individuals younger or older than 18 years. METHODS: The clavicles of 220 volunteers (16-26 years) were examined with 3-T MRI and evaluated according to the Schmeling and Kreitner classification (Schmeling, Int J Legal Med 118:5-8, 2004; Kreitner, Eur Radiol 8:1116-1122, 1998). An additional hand/wrist radiograph was taken and evaluated according to Greulich and Pyle (1959). After a descriptive analysis, a multivariate ordinal regression model was fitted and embedded in a Bayesian framework based on Thevissen et al. (Int J Legal Med 124:35-42, 2009). RESULTS: The descriptive results were concordant with the literature, although the Kreitner classification is recommended and simultaneous evaluation of the hand is considered a basic requirement (Schmeling, Int J Legal Med 118:5-8, 2004). The 95 % credibility interval for both genders with bilateral stage IV is 20-26 years. The corresponding estimated probability of being younger than 18 years is 0.8 % in females and 0.2 % in males. CONCLUSION: MRI of the sternal extremity of the clavicle can be used to differentiate between being younger or older than 18, but a simultaneous evaluation of the hand/wrist is essential. Future evaluation of the predictive performance of the model, using comparable but larger reference samples, is necessary to validate these results.
Authors: Manuel Kellinghaus; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Heidi Pfeiffer; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Andreas Schmeling; Ronald Schulz; Walter Reisinger; Matthias Mühler; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Gunther Geserick Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2003-10-08 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Sven Schmidt; Matthias Mühler; Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Ronald Schulz Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 2.791
Authors: Yucheng Guo; Andreas Olze; Christian Ottow; Sven Schmidt; Ronald Schulz; Walter Heindel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Christian Ottow; Ronald Schulz; Klaus Püschel; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Heidi Pfeiffer; Volker Vieth; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Daniel Wittschieber; Ronald Schulz; Volker Vieth; Martin Küppers; Thomas Bajanowski; Frank Ramsthaler; Klaus Püschel; Heidi Pfeiffer; Sven Schmidt; Andreas Schmeling Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Michel De Maeseneer; Leon Lenchik; Nico Buls; Cedric Boulet; Seema Döring; Johan de Mey; Inneke Willekens Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Petar Milenkovic; Marija Djuric; Petar Milovanovic; Ksenija Djukic; Vladimir Zivkovic; Slobodan Nikolic Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.686