| Literature DB >> 28676080 |
Shijia Liu1, Peidong Chen2, Yang Zhao3, Guoliang Dai1, Bingting Sun2, Yao Wang1, Anwei Ding2, Wenzheng Ju4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitiglinide is a widely used agent for diabetic treatment. We established a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model to illustrate the relationship between mitiglinide plasma concentration and its glucose lowering effects in healthy volunteers.Entities:
Keywords: Mitiglinide; Pharmacodynamic; Pharmacokinetic; Pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamics modeling; Plasma glucose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28676080 PMCID: PMC5496406 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-017-0161-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Fig. 1Scheme of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK–PD) model. A1, mitiglinide amounts in the central compartment; A2, mitiglinide amounts in the peripheral compartment; C, mitiglinide concentration in the central compartment; C2, mitiglinide concentration in the peripheral compartment; V, central volume of the distribution of mitiglinide; V2, peripheral compartment; ke0, glucose disappearance rate constant; E, level of glucose in the plasma, E0, blood glucose maintained at a certain level in absence of the drug; Ce, plasma concentration in the effect compartment
Fig. 2Plasma mitiglinide concentration and plasma glucose concentration after a single oral dose of 10 mg mitiglinide to healthy volunteers (mean ± SD, n = 18)
Non-compartmental parameters for mitiglinide after a single 10 mg oral dose in healthy volunteers (mean ± SD, n = 18)
| Parameter | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
|
| 1.69 ± 0.16 |
|
| 0.25 (0.17–0.50) |
| CL/F (L/h) | 7.80 ± 1.84 |
| Vd/F (L) | 23.96 ± 7.23 |
|
| 1165.10 ± 357.50 |
| AUC 0-t (ng/mL·h) | 1489.60 ± 336.85 |
| AUC0-∞ (ng/mL·h) | 1497.20 ± 339.73 |
| AUC0-t / AUC0-∞ (%) | 99.51 ± 0. 16 |
Population modeling parameters for mitiglinide after a single 10 mg oral dose to healthy volunteers (mean ± SD, n = 18)
| Parameter | Mean ± SD | Inter-individual variability (CV %) |
|---|---|---|
| Ka (/h) | 9.57 ± 2.38 | 91.95 |
| Tlag (h) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 70.71 |
| V (L) | 6.15 ± 0.33 | 17.61 |
| CL (L/h) | 0.03 ± 0.01 | - |
| V2 (L) | 104.69 ± 11.37 | - |
| Cl2 (L/h) | 9.85 ± 0.51 | 22.18 |
| IC50 (μg/mL) | 1.13 ± 0.08 | - |
| E0 (mmol/L) | 4.65 ± 0.09 | 4.35 |
| Ke0 (/h) | 7.47 ± 1.89 | 90.61 |
| Gamma | 1.66 ± 0.18 | 18.67 |
Fig. 3Population fitting of plasma mitiglinide concentration and plasma glucose concentration after a single oral dose of 10 mg mitiglinide to healthy volunteers (Left: Population prediction of plasma concentration vs time, Right: Population Prediction of glucose concentration vs time). The solid line is the best fit of the PK-PD model. (DV, Dependent value; PRED, Population prediction)
Fig. 4Diagnostic plots of the final Population PK-PD model for mitiglinide from studies. Diagnostic plots include (a) Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES) and independent variable (IVAR), (b) weighted residuals versus predicted values (PRED), (c) Plot of the observed value (DV) versus individual population predicted values (IPRE) and (d) The observed value versus population predicted values (PRED)