| Literature DB >> 24445843 |
Yingtong Zeng1, Xingqian Xie2, Jingjing Duan2, Ting Zhou2, Ye Zhang2, Min Yang1, Feng Xu2.
Abstract
Many diabetic patients complicated with wild to severe depression. It is unclear in diabetic medication whether depression perturbs the drug metabolic process of the hypoglycemic agents or not. The present study was designed to investigate the impact of chronic unpredicted mild stress (CUMS) -induced depression on mitiglinide (MGN) pharmacokinetics in rats. Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats in CUMS group were subjected to different types of stressors and the stress procedures lasted for 8 weeks. Control group without receiving stress had free access to food and water. Open-field test and 5-HT levels were assayed to evaluate the depression. After CUMS all rats were given 2.5 mg/kg of mitiglinide per os. The blood samples were collected at different time and mitiglinide plasma concentration was measured by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Non-compartmental statistical moment analysis was processed with DAS software. In CMUS-induced depression group, peak concentration (Cmax), peak time (Tmax), area under curve (AUC0 → ∞), mean residence time (MRT0 → ∞), and half-life (T1/2z) were reduced while total plasma clearance (CLz/F) was increased compared to control group. These preliminary results indicated that CUMS-induced depression alter the drug metabolic process of mitiglinide in rats. This finding will be significant in clinic.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24445843 PMCID: PMC3896903 DOI: 10.1038/srep03794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Full-scan positive ESI-MS/MS production spectra mitiglinide (316 ->298).
Figure 2Typical chromatograms of mitiglinide (Top, retention time 1.40 min.) and internal standard nateglinide (Bottom, retention time 1.30 min.) in blank plasma, plasma spiked with mitiglinide/nateglinide, and rat plasma sample.
Recovery, matrix effect, precision and accuracy for the determination of MGN in plasma by HPLC-MS/MS
| Nominal concentration (μg/ml) | Recovery (%) | Measured concentration (μg/ml) | Accuracy (%) | Matrix effect (%) | Intra-day precision (RSD%) | Inter-day precision (RSD%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92.27 ± 0.66 | 2.603 ± 0.104 | 104.13 | 93.76 ± 5.57 | 4.32 | 7.53 | |
| 91.60 ± 4.90 | 1.039 ± 0.040 | 103.90 | 96.57 ± 1.14 | 4.19 | 6.67 | |
| 98.64 ± 6.66 | 0.049 ± 0.002 | 98.75 | 93.89 ± 9.06 | 3.82 | 5.18 |
Notes: Data are based on analysis of six replicates (n = 6) on three separate days.
The main pharmacokinetic moment parameters of MGN
| Parameter | Control group (n = 9) | Depression group (n = 9) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cmax | ug/mL | 1.88 ± 0.23 | 1.84 ± 0.93 |
| Tmax | min | 23.00 ± 25.30 | 22.22 ± 14.17 |
| AUC(0–∞) | ug/mL | 501.79 ± 68.24 | 475.16 ± 62.01 |
| MRT(0–∞) | min | 367.02 ± 85.84 | 245.95 ± 68.83 |
| t1/2z | min | 256.12 ± 48.50 | 168.10 ± 34.68 |
| CLz/F | mL/min | 0.83 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.11 |
Notes: * p < 0.05 compared with control group.