Literature DB >> 28674735

Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15-20 years' follow-up.

Ea Løwenstein1, Lars Alling Møller2, Jennie Laigaard2, Helga Gimbel3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives were to determine the reoperation rate of primary pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, to describe the age distribution of the women at primary surgery for those undergoing a reoperation, and to describe the incidence of second and third reoperations.
METHODS: We carried out a population-based registry study of Danish women above the age of 18 years when undergoing primary surgery for POP during the period 1996-2000. Data were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. All women were followed until one of the following events occurred: reoperation for POP, death, emigration, or end of follow-up period. Reoperation was defined as "repeated surgery in same compartment". The cumulative incidence rate of reoperation was divided into three compartments (anterior, apical, and posterior) and was calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots.
RESULTS: A total of 18,382 procedures were performed on 11,805 women. After 20 years' follow-up, the cumulated incidence rate of reoperation for POP in the anterior, apical, and posterior compartments was 12.4%, 7.9%, and 12.1% respectively. The overall rate of reoperation was 11.5%. Of women aged between 18 and 49 years of age at primary surgery, 26.9% had a reoperation, whereas in women between 50 and 90+ years of age at primary surgery, only 10.1% had a reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: This large study with up to 20 years' follow-up has found that reoperation for POP is modest, that the reoperation rate is lowest for the apical compartment, but highest in all three compartments during the first year after primary surgery. The reoperation rate peaks in the group of women who had their primary surgery before the menopause in all three compartments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compartment; Pelvic organ prolapse; Recurrence; Reoperation; Repeated surgery; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28674735     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3395-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  17 in total

1.  Epidemiologic evaluation of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Amanda L Clark; Thomas Gregory; Virginia J Smith; Renee Edwards
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse within 10 years of primary surgery for prolapse.

Authors:  Philipp T Gotthart; Thomas Aigmueller; Peter F J Lang; George Ralph; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Karl Tamussino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Fiona J Smith; C D'Arcy J Holman; Rachael E Moorin; Nicolas Tsokos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Christopher F Maher; Matthew D Barber; Sérgio Camargo; Vani Dandolu; Alex Digesu; Howard B Goldman; Martin Huser; Alfredo L Milani; Paul A Moran; Gabriel N Schaer; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Reoperation 10 years after surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Mary Anna Denman; W Thomas Gregory; Sarah H Boyles; Virginia Smith; S Renee Edwards; Amanda L Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  [Hysterectomy in Denmark. An analysis of postoperative hospitalization, morbidity and readmission].

Authors:  Charlotte Møller; Henrik Kehlet; Jan Utzon; Bent S Ottesen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2002-09-23

7.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Reoperation rate for traditional anterior vaginal repair: analysis of 207 cases with a median 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Marika Nemcova; Konstantinos Pantazis; Paula Brockman; Luigi Bombieri; Robert M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  [Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  Marianne Ottesen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2009-02-02

10.  Risk of Prolapse Recurrence after Native Tissue Anterior Vaginal Suspension Procedure with Intermediate to Long-Term Followup.

Authors:  Rebecca S Lavelle; Alana L Christie; Feras Alhalabi; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of suture material used in anterior colporrhaphy and the risk of recurrence.

Authors:  Emelie Valtersson; Karen Ruben Husby; Marlene Elmelund; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Caroline Pettenati; Florence Cour; Pierre-Olivier Bosset; Titouan Kennel; Adrien Vidart; Thierry Lebret
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Trends in prolapse surgery in England.

Authors:  Martino Maria Zacche; Sambit Mukhopadhyay; Ilias Giarenis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The added value of conventional defecography and MRI defecography in clinical decision making on treatment for posterior compartment prolapse.

Authors:  Dionne M Nijland; Linde T van Genugten; Karin S Dekker; Gert Jan Wagenmakers; Sicco J Braak; Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven; Annemarie van der Steen; Anique T M Grob
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Body mass index influences the risk of reoperation after first-time surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. A Danish cohort study, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Vibeke Weltz; Rikke Guldberg; Michael Due Larsen; Gunnar Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Effects of mesh-related complications in vaginal surgery on quality of life.

Authors:  Claudia R Kowalik; Mariëlle M E Lakeman; Alyde T de Kraker; Jan Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Sascha F M Schulten; Renée J Detollenaere; Jelle Stekelenburg; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-09-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.