Dionne M Nijland1, Linde T van Genugten2, Karin S Dekker2, Gert Jan Wagenmakers3, Sicco J Braak3, Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven2, Annemarie van der Steen2, Anique T M Grob4,5. 1. Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Building Technohal, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522, NB, Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands. 4. Multi-Modality Medical Imaging, Faculty of Science and Technology, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Building Technohal, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522, NB, Enschede, The Netherlands. a.t.m.grob@utwente.nl. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands. a.t.m.grob@utwente.nl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Conventional defecography and MRI defecography can be requested as an additional test for diagnosing and differentiating the type of posterior compartment prolapse and/or obstructive defecation disorders. The objective of this study was to determine the added value of conventional defecography, conventional defecography and MRI defecography for clinical decision-making on treatment for patients with posterior compartment prolapse. METHODS: Four gynecologists were asked to fill in their treatment plan per patient for 32 cases for three different steps. Step 1 consisted of information on the anamnesis and physical examination (POP-Q). Step 2 consisted of Step 1, including conventional defecography (group A) or MRI defecography (group B). In Step 3, all gynecologists received the information on Step 1 including both conventional defecography and MRI defecography. Data analysis solely focused on the assessment of changes in the gynecological treatment plan of the posterior compartment. RESULTS: After Step 2 a change in treatment plan occurred in 37% and 48% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. Accordingly, after Step 3 (including all imaging data), a change in treatment plan occurred in 19% and 52% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. A change within the surgery group (when a different type of surgery was selected) was seen for a total of 11 cases in group A and 20 in group B in all steps combined. CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional defecography and MRI defecography had an large effect on the treatment plan for patients with posterior compartment prolapse. The dedicated added value of the imaging modality individually cannot be concluded yet.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Conventional defecography and MRI defecography can be requested as an additional test for diagnosing and differentiating the type of posterior compartment prolapse and/or obstructive defecation disorders. The objective of this study was to determine the added value of conventional defecography, conventional defecography and MRI defecography for clinical decision-making on treatment for patients with posterior compartment prolapse. METHODS: Four gynecologists were asked to fill in their treatment plan per patient for 32 cases for three different steps. Step 1 consisted of information on the anamnesis and physical examination (POP-Q). Step 2 consisted of Step 1, including conventional defecography (group A) or MRI defecography (group B). In Step 3, all gynecologists received the information on Step 1 including both conventional defecography and MRI defecography. Data analysis solely focused on the assessment of changes in the gynecological treatment plan of the posterior compartment. RESULTS: After Step 2 a change in treatment plan occurred in 37% and 48% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. Accordingly, after Step 3 (including all imaging data), a change in treatment plan occurred in 19% and 52% of the women in groups A and B, respectively. A change within the surgery group (when a different type of surgery was selected) was seen for a total of 11 cases in group A and 20 in group B in all steps combined. CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional defecography and MRI defecography had an large effect on the treatment plan for patients with posterior compartment prolapse. The dedicated added value of the imaging modality individually cannot be concluded yet.
Authors: E Poncelet; A Rock; J-F Quinton; M Cosson; N Ramdane; L Nicolas; A Feldmann; J Salleron Journal: Diagn Interv Imaging Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 4.026
Authors: Dean D T Maglinte; Clive I Bartram; Douglass A Hale; Jean Park; Marc D Kohli; Bruce W Robb; Stefania Romano; John C Lappas Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 11.105