Literature DB >> 33620535

Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse.

Caroline Pettenati1, Florence Cour2, Pierre-Olivier Bosset2, Titouan Kennel3, Adrien Vidart2, Thierry Lebret2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate vaginal hysterectomy (VH) associated with vaginal native tissue repair (VNTR) using Campbell uterosacral ligament suspension (C-USLS) for the treatment of predominant uterine prolapse associated with cystocele.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study including patients who underwent VH and C-USLS, without concomitant mesh, for primary urogenital prolapse between January 2011 and June 2018. We evaluated the anterior and apical prolapse recurrence rate, using a composite criterion (symptomatic, asymptomatic recurrence, POP-Q stage ≥ 2). We analyzed 2-year recurrence-free survival using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual satisfaction.
RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included. Eighty-three (88.3%) and 65 (69.1%) patients had stage ≥ 3 uterine prolapse and cystocele, respectively. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Prolapse recurrence rate was 21.3% including 3.2% of cystocele. Two-year recurrence-free survival was 80%. Age, body mass index, POP-Q stage and associated surgical procedure were not significantly associated with recurrence. Early complications were reported for 20 patients (21.2%), mostly grade ≤ 2 (95%). De novo LUTS were reported in 11 cases (11.7%). Preoperative stress urinary incontinence and urgency were cured for 12 (80%) and 29 (80.6%) patients, respectively. Sexual satisfaction rate for patients with preoperative sexual activity was 95.8%.
CONCLUSION: C-USLS following VH as primary treatment for predominant uterine prolapse with associated cystocele is a safe procedure with satisfying mid-term functional results. This VNTR could be an alternative in light of the worldwide market withdrawal of actual vaginal mesh.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cystocele; Hysterectomy; Non-mesh; Urogenital prolapse; Uterosacral ligaments; Vaginal native tissue repair

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33620535     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04674-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  19 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Joseph Lee; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Rebecca U Margulies; Mary A M Rogers; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Surgical management of anterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidencebased literature review.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Kaven Baessler
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-05-25

Review 4.  Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Andrade de Oliveira; Marcelo C M Fonseca; Maria A T Bortolini; Manoel J B C Girão; Matheus T Roque; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Surgery for Anterior Compartment Vaginal Prolapse: Suture-Based Repair.

Authors:  Katherine Amin; Una Lee
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention.

Authors:  Michele Carlo Schiavi; Delia Savone; Daniele Di Mascio; Chiara Di Tucci; Giorgia Perniola; Marzio Angelo Zullo; Ludovico Muzii; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Ethan M Balk; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Changes in prolapse surgery trends relative to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh.

Authors:  Laura C Skoczylas; Lindsay C Turner; Li Wang; Daniel G Winger; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Evidence-Based Review of Vaginal Native Tissue Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.

Authors:  Tanya P Hoke; Jasmine Tan-Kim; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 10.  Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Corina Christmann-Schmid; Nir Haya; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.