Literature DB >> 32780173

Body mass index influences the risk of reoperation after first-time surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. A Danish cohort study, 2010-2016.

Vibeke Weltz1, Rikke Guldberg2, Michael Due Larsen3, Gunnar Lose4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) up to 5 years after first-time surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide register-based study includes first-time POP surgery in 2010 through 2016. The cumulative incidence proportions of reoperation were analyzed in a Cox regression model and described using Kaplan-Meier plots stratified in BMI categories.
RESULTS: A total of 28,533 first-time procedures were performed in 22,624 women; 76.6% had single-compartment repair. The 1- and 5-year reoperation rate within the same compartment was 2.6% and 6.1% respectively for women with BMI < 25, and for women with BMI > 35 it was 3.7% and 11.2 respectively. In the anterior compartment there was a significantly increased adjusted hazard ratio for reoperation in the same compartment with increasing BMI (reference group BMI < 25), BMI 30-34.9 with an aHR = 1.34 (CI 95% 1.04-1.71) and BMI ≥ 35 aHR = 1.77 (CI 95% 1.17-2.67). The 1- and 5-year reoperation rate in an adjacent compartment was 0.6% and 1.6% respectively for women with BMI < 25, and for women with BMI > 35 it was 1.0% and 4.4 respectively. For reoperation in an adjacent compartment the adjusted results were BMI 30-34.9 aHR = 1.64 (95% CI 1.05-2.56) and BMI > 35 aHR = 2.64 (95% CI 1.36-5.14) when the first-time operation was in the anterior compartment.
CONCLUSIONS: If the woman had BMI > 35 and first-time surgery was in the anterior compartment, she had an almost doubled risk of reoperation within 5 years both in the same compartment and in an adjacent compartment compared to women with BMI < 35. In the apical and posterior compartment there was a trend towards increasing risk of reoperation with increasing BMI, although with a broad confidence interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Pelvic organ prolapse; Reoperation; Surgery

Year:  2020        PMID: 32780173     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04482-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  10 in total

1.  Operation for pelvic organ prolapse: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Gunilla Tegerstedt; Margareta Hammarström
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 2.  Risk factors for recurrence of genital prolapse.

Authors:  Stefano Salvatore; Gabriele Siesto; Maurizio Serati
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Risk factors for prolapse recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Talia Friedman; Guy D Eslick; Hans Peter Dietz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse.

Authors:  Stefano Manodoro; Matteo Frigerio; Alice Cola; Federico Spelzini; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  The Danish National Patient Register.

Authors:  Elsebeth Lynge; Jakob Lynge Sandegaard; Matejka Rebolj
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 6.  Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Ayush Giri; Katherine E Hartmann; Jacklyn N Hellwege; Digna R Velez Edwards; Todd L Edwards
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The incidence of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse: an 11-year experience.

Authors:  Natalia Price; Alex Slack; Eman Jwarah; Simon Jackson
Journal:  Menopause Int       Date:  2008-12

8.  Reoperation for pelvic organ prolapse: a Danish cohort study with 15-20 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Ea Løwenstein; Lars Alling Møller; Jennie Laigaard; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tineke F M Vergeldt; Mirjam Weemhoff; Joanna IntHout; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Factors influencing the outcome of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Katja Stenström Bohlin; Maud Ankardal; Emil Nüssler; Håkan Lindkvist; Ian Milsom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.894

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Adverse outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women 65 years and older in the United States.

Authors:  C Emi Bretschneider; Charles D Scales; Oyomoare Osazuwa-Peters; David Sheyn; Vivian Sung
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 1.932

2.  The Application of a Multidimensional Prediction Model in the Recurrence of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Surgery.

Authors:  Ruirui Zhang; Liming Wang; Yawei Shao
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.664

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.