| Literature DB >> 28672916 |
Ruijuan Han1, Kai Sun2, Bin Lu2, Ruiping Zhao3, Kuncheng Li4, Xinchun Yang1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of second generation dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with suspected MI. In total, 56 patients underwent DECT. Among those, 40 patients had MI that was detected by catheter coronary angiography and cardiac troponin I elevation and evolution of acute MI detected by electrocardiogram changes. The diagnostic accuracy, including the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of MI were evaluated, as well as the coronary image quality of coronary artery and radiation dose. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the detection of MI were 95.0, 97.0, 86.4 and 98.9%, respectively. Moreover, the image quality was rated excellent (score 1) in 90.2% (515/571), good (score 2) in 6.5% (37/571), adequate (score 3) in 1.9% (11/571) and non-diagnostic (score 4) in 1.4% (8/571) of the coronary segments. The effective radiation dose was on average 6.1±1.5 mSv (3.1-10.9 mSv). Therefore, combined DE iodine maps and coronary CT angiography using the DECT may provide a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting MI with lower radiation exposure in patients with suspected MI.Entities:
Keywords: computed tomography; dual-energy; heart perfusion; myocardial infarction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28672916 PMCID: PMC5488534 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for myocardial infarction based on cardiovascular evaluation.
| Parameter | CTA only | Iodine only | CTA + iodine |
|---|---|---|---|
| True positive | 18 | 17 | 19 |
| False positive | 9 | 7 | 3 |
| True negative | 91 | 93 | 97 |
| False negative | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 90.0 (95% CI, 68.2–98.4%) | 85.0 (95% CI, 62.1–96.6%) | 95.0 (95% CI, 75.1–99.2%) |
| Specificity (%) | 91.0 (95% CI, 83.6–98.4%) | 93 (95% CI, 86.1–97.1%) | 97.0 (95% CI, 91.5–99.3%) |
| Positive predictive value (%) | 66.7 (95% CI, 46.1–83.4%) | 70.8 (95% CI, 48.9–87.3%) | 86.4 (95% CI, 65.1–96.9%) |
| Negative predictive value (%) | 97.8 (95% CI, 92.4–99.6%) | 96.8 (95% CI, 91.1–99.3%) | 98.9 (95% CI, 94.4–99.8%) |
CTA, computed tomography angiography; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 1.A 63-year-old female complained of chest stuffiness. (A and B) Images indicate failure to visualize the middle segment of the anterior descending branch with coronary artery angiography upon admission (yellow arrow). The case was treated for an acute myocardial infarction due to an anterior descending branch occlusion. (C and D) Images indicate the small distal segment of the left anterior descending artery by computed tomography angiography plus dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) (yellow arrow). The blood was supplied to the anterior descending branch by the collateral circulation of the right coronary artery. An aneurysm was observed in the anterior descending branch (blue arrow). (E and F) Show myocardial iodine maps from DECT, indicating normal myocardial perfusion.
Figure 2.A 56-year-old male complained of chest stuffiness for three days. No electrocardiogram abnormalities were found upon admission to Baotou Central hospital (Baotou, China). The patient came to our hospital and received dual-energy computed tomography. (A and B) Images show complete occlusion of the middle and distal segments of the right coronary artery with computed tomography angiography (yellow arrow). (C) Myocardial iodine map indicating a perfusion defect in the inferior wall segment (white arrows). (D) Image demonstrates occlusion of the middle and distal segments of the right coronary artery as confirmed by coronary artery angiography (yellow arrow).
Qualitative analysis of image quality.
| Coronary artery | RCA | LM | LAD | CX | IA | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| Evaluated segments | 40 | 40 | 35 | 35 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 40 | 38 | 38 | 32 | 23 | 28 |
| Score 1 | 29 | 25 | 23 | 31 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 33 | 33 | 34 | 40 | 38 | 31 | 30 | 20 | 28 |
| Score 2 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Score 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
RCA, right coronary artery; LM, left main; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; IA, intermediate branch.