Literature DB >> 20658242

Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography.

Sung Min Ko1, Jin Woo Choi, Meong Gun Song, Je Kyoun Shin, Hyun Kun Chee, Hyun Woo Chung, Dong Hun Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-stress dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for detecting haemodynamically significant stenosis causing reversible myocardial perfusion defect (PD) compared with stress perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (SP-MRI) and conventional coronary angiography (CCA).
METHODS: Fifty patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) detected by dual-source CT (DSCT) were investigated by contrast-enhanced, stress DECT with high- and low-energy x-ray spectra settings during adenosine infusion. A colour-coded iodine map was used for evaluation of myocardial PDs compared with rest DSCT perfusion images. Reversible myocardial PDs according to the stress DECT/rest DSCT were compared with SP-MRI on a segmental basis and CCA on a vascular territorial basis.
RESULTS: A total of 697 myocardial segments and 123 vascular territories of 41 patients were analysed. Three hundred one segments and 72 vascular territories in 38 patients showed reversible PDs on stress DECT. Stress DECT had 89% sensitivity, 78% specificity and 82% accuracy for detecting segments with reversible PDs seen on SP-MRI (n=28). Compared with CCA (n=41), stress DECT had 89% sensitivity, 76% specificity and 83% accuracy for the detection of vascular territories with reversible myocardial PDs that had haemodynamically relevant CAD.
CONCLUSION: Adenosine stress DECT can identify stress-induced myocardial PD in patients with CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20658242     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1897-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart.

Authors:  Richard L Morin; Thomas C Gerber; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress.

Authors:  Richard T George; Caterina Silva; Marco A S Cordeiro; Anthony DiPaula; Douglas R Thompson; William F McCarthy; Takashi Ichihara; Joao A C Lima; Albert C Lardo
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

Authors:  J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply.

Authors:  Balazs Ruzsics; Florian Schwarz; U Joseph Schoepf; Yeong Shyan Lee; Gorka Bastarrika; Salvatore A Chiaramida; Philip Costello; Peter L Zwerner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography.

Authors:  Jose A Rocha-Filho; Ron Blankstein; Leonid D Shturman; Hiram G Bezerra; David R Okada; Ian S Rogers; Brian Ghoshhajra; Udo Hoffmann; Gudrun Feuchtner; Wilfred S Mamuya; Thomas J Brady; Ricardo C Cury
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Technical principles of dual source CT.

Authors:  Martin Petersilka; Herbert Bruder; Bernhard Krauss; Karl Stierstorfer; Thomas G Flohr
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Julie M Miller; Kakuya Kitagawa; Hyuk-Jae Chang; David A Bluemke; Lewis Becker; Omair Yousuf; John Texter; Albert C Lardo; João A C Lima
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Diagnostic performance of fusion of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Cesar A Santana; Ernest V Garcia; Tracy L Faber; Gopi K R Sirineni; Fabio P Esteves; Rupan Sanyal; Raghuveer Halkar; Mario Ornelas; Liudmila Verdes; Stamatios Lerakis; Julie J Ramos; Santiago Aguadé-Bruix; Hugo Cuéllar; Jaume Candell-Riera; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  49 in total

1.  Optimization of energy level for coronary angiography with dual-energy and dual-source computed tomography.

Authors:  Satoshi Okayama; Ayako Seno; Tsunenari Soeda; Yasuhiro Takami; Rika Kawakami; Satoshi Somekawa; Ken-Ichi Ishigami; Yukiji Takeda; Hiroyuki Kawata; Manabu Horii; Shiro Uemura; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Commentary on: delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI.

Authors:  Florian Wolf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Important advances in technology and unique applications to cardiovascular computed tomography.

Authors:  Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai; Su Yeon Choi; Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications.

Authors:  Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Advances in myocardial CT perfusion imaging technology.

Authors:  Yan Yi; Zheng-Yu Jin; Yi-Ning Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 7.  Infarct characterization using CT.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Erica Maffei; Filippo Cademartiri; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

Review 8.  New Applications of Cardiac Computed Tomography: Dual-Energy, Spectral, and Molecular CT Imaging.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Zahi A Fayad; Martin J Willemink; James K Min
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-06

9.  Detection of ischaemic myocardial lesions with coronary CT angiography and adenosine-stress dynamic perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: diagnostic performance in comparison with cardiac MRI.

Authors:  S M Kim; J-H Choi; S-A Chang; Y H Choe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Current status of cardiac CT for the detection of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A Schuhbäck; M Marwan; R C Cury; S Achenbach
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.