Literature DB >> 20643238

Dipyridamole stress and rest myocardial perfusion by 64-detector row computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Roberto C Cury1, Tiago A Magalhães, Anna C Borges, Afonso A Shiozaki, Pedro A Lemos, José Soares Júnior, José Cláudio Meneghetti, Ricardo C Cury, Carlos E Rochitte.   

Abstract

Recently, stress myocardial computed tomographic perfusion (CTP) was shown to detect myocardial ischemia. Our main objective was to evaluate the feasibility of dipyridamole stress CTP and compare it to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect significant coronary stenosis using invasive conventional coronary angiography (CCA; stenosis >70%) as the reference method. Thirty-six patients (62 +/- 8 years old, 20 men) with previous positive results with SPECT (<2 months) as the primary inclusion criterion and suspected coronary artery disease underwent a customized multidetector-row CT protocol with myocardial perfusion evaluation at rest and during stress and coronary CT angiography (CTA). Multidetector-row computed tomography was performed in a 64-slice scanner with dipyridamole stress perfusion acquisition before a second perfusion/CT angiographic acquisition at rest. Independent blinded observers performed analysis of images from CTP, CTA, and CCA. All 36 patients completed the CT protocol with no adverse events (mean radiation dose 14.7 +/- 3.0 mSv) and with interpretable scans. CTP results were positive in 27 of 36 patients (75%). From the 9 (25%) disagreements, 6 patients had normal coronary arteries and 2 had no significant stenosis (8 false-positive results with SPECT, 22%). The remaining patient had an occluded artery with collateral flow confirmed by conventional coronary angiogram. Good agreement was demonstrated between CTP and SPECT on a per-patient analysis (kappa 0.53). In 26 patients using CCA as reference, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 88.0%, 79.3%, 66.7%, and 93.3% for CTP and 68.8, 76.1%, 66.7%, and 77.8%, for SPECT, respectively (p = NS). In conclusion, dipyridamole CT myocardial perfusion at rest and during stress is feasible and results are similar to single-photon emission CT scintigraphy. The anatomical-perfusion information provided by this combined CT protocol may allow identification of false-positive results by SPECT. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643238     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  34 in total

1.  Myocardial hypo-enhancement on resting computed tomography angiography images accurately identifies myocardial hypoperfusion.

Authors:  Joshua L Busch; Adam M Alessio; James H Caldwell; Mohit Gupta; Songshou Mao; Jigar Kadakia; William Shuman; Matthew J Budoff; Kelley R Branch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-10-24

2.  Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging using 320 row detector computed tomography: design and implementation of the CORE320 multicenter, multinational diagnostic study.

Authors:  Andrea L Vavere; Gregory G Simon; Richard T George; Carlos E Rochitte; Andrew E Arai; Julie M Miller; Marcello Di Carli; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Armin A Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Roger Laham; Frank J Rybicki; Joanne D Schuijf; Narinder Paul; John Hoe; Sachio Kuribyashi; Hajime Sakuma; Cesar Nomura; Tan Swee Yaw; Klaus F Kofoed; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Melvin E Clouse; Jeffrey Brinker; Christopher Cox; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011-11-12

Review 3.  Stress CT perfusion: coupling coronary anatomy with physiology.

Authors:  Edward A Hulten; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Brian Ghoshhajra; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

Review 6.  CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging-practical considerations: acquisition, image analysis, interpretation, and challenges.

Authors:  Vishal C Mehra; Marietta Ambrose; Carolina Valdiviezo-Schlomp; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Joao A C Lima; Richard T George
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Important advances in technology and unique applications to cardiovascular computed tomography.

Authors:  Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai; Su Yeon Choi; Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

Review 8.  Infarct characterization using CT.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Erica Maffei; Filippo Cademartiri; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

9.  Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Tiago A Magalhães; Satoru Kishi; Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Andrea L Vavere; Christopher Cox; Matthew B Matheson; Julie M Miller; Jeffrey Brinker; Marcelo Di Carli; Frank J Rybicki; Carlos E Rochitte; Melvin E Clouse; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-03-21

10.  Current status of cardiac CT for the detection of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  A Schuhbäck; M Marwan; R C Cury; S Achenbach
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.