Literature DB >> 28670652

Decision making in advanced heart failure: bench, bedside, practice, and policy.

Daniel D Matlock1,2,3, William C McGuire4, Molly Magid5, Larry Allen6,7.   

Abstract

This is an exciting time for patient-centered care. The window of opportunity appears to be open for the medical culture to accept the importance of the patients' values, goals and preferences in guiding medical decisions. Heart failure guidelines are changing to include language around shared decision making for major procedures and end-of-life care. However, while the cultural norms appear to be moving in this direction, the science regarding how to best deliver patient centered care (basic, clinical, delivery, and policy) is still developing. This article will provide a broad overview of the science of decision making in advanced heart failure using a translational science framework.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision aids; Decision making; Implementation science; Shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28670652      PMCID: PMC5693690          DOI: 10.1007/s10741-017-9631-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  33 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Curran; Mark Bauer; Brian Mittman; Jeffrey M Pyne; Cheryl Stetler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Sacubitril-Valsartan for the Treatment of Heart Failure: Effectiveness and Value.

Authors:  Daniel A Ollendorf; Alexander T Sandhu; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Confusing Relative Risk with Absolute Risk Is Associated with More Enthusiastic Beliefs about the Value of Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Tanner J Caverly; Allan V Prochazka; Ingrid A Binswanger; Jean S Kutner; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

Review 6.  Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rebecca Say; Madeleine Murtagh; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-02

7.  Bereaved Caregiver Perspectives on the End-of-Life Experience of Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Jacqueline Jones; Larry A Allen; Keith M Swetz; Carolyn Nowels; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Dylan M Smith; Peter A Ubel; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Decision making for destination therapy left ventricular assist devices: "there was no choice" versus "I thought about it an awful lot".

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Larry A Allen; Carolyn Nowels; Andreas Brieke; Joseph C Cleveland; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-05-13

Review 10.  Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Richard Thomson; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Amy Lloyd; Paul Kinnersley; Emma Cording; Dave Tomson; Carole Dodd; Stephen Rollnick; Adrian Edwards; Michael Barry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study.

Authors:  Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Sarah N Hilmer; Michael A Steinman; Daniel D Matlock; Mathew S Maurer; Mark S Lachs; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.716

2.  Determining the factors for interhospital transfer in advanced heart failure cases.

Authors:  Koichi Narita; Eisuke Amiya; Masaru Hatano; Junichi Ishida; Shun Minatsuki; Masaki Tsuji; Chie Bujo; Nobutaka Kakuda; Yoshitaka Isotani; Minoru Ono; Issei Komuro
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-05-14

Review 3.  Why has positive inotropy failed in chronic heart failure? Lessons from prior inotrope trials.

Authors:  Tariq Ahmad; P Elliott Miller; Megan McCullough; Nihar R Desai; Ralph Riello; Mitchell Psotka; Michael Böhm; Larry A Allen; John R Teerlink; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Joann Lindenfeld
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 15.534

Review 4.  Framework for improving outcome prediction for acute to chronic low back pain transitions.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz; Jason M Beneciuk; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Jennifer M Mundt; Jeff Boissoneault
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.