Literature DB >> 16442453

Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.

Rebecca Say1, Madeleine Murtagh, Richard Thomson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to clarify present knowledge about the factors which influence patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making.
METHODS: A thorough search of the literature was carried out to identify quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the factors which influence patients' preference for involvement in decision making. All studies were rigorously critically appraised.
RESULTS: Patients' preferences are influenced by: demographic variables (with younger, better educated patients and women being quite consistently found to prefer a more active role in decision making), their experience of illness and medical care, their diagnosis and health status, the type of decision they need to make, the amount of knowledge they have acquired about their condition, their attitude towards involvement, and the interactions and relationships they experience with health professionals. Their preferences are likely to develop over time as they gain experience and may change at different stages of their illness.
CONCLUSION: While patients' preferences for involvement in decision making are variable and the process of developing them likely to be highly complex, this review has identified a number of influences on patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making, some of which are consistent across studies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: By identifying the factors which might influence patients' preference for involvement, health professionals may be more sensitive to individual patients' preferences and provide better patient-centred care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16442453     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  182 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.

Authors:  Laya Poost-Foroosh; Mary Beth Jennings; Lynn Shaw; Christine N Meston; Margaret F Cheesman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API).

Authors:  Daniela Simon; Levente Kriston; Andreas Loh; Claudia Spies; Fueloep Scheibler; Celia Wills; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Gerda T G J Woltjer; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-27

5.  Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations.

Authors:  Roger Ruiz Moral; Lucía Peralta Munguía; Luis Ángel Pérula de Torres; Maria Teresa Carrión; Jorge Olloqui Mundet; Mariana Martínez
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Toward a greater understanding of breast cancer patients' decisions to discuss cancer-related internet information with their doctors: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Thomas A D'Agostino; Jamie S Ostroff; Alexandra Heerdt; Maura Dickler; Yuelin Li; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-19

7.  The impact of patient autonomy on older adults with asthma.

Authors:  Keerthi R Karamched; Wei Hao; Peter X Song; Laurie Carpenter; Joel Steinberg; Alan P Baptist
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Barriers to shared decisions in the most serious of cancers: a qualitative study of patients with pancreatic cancer treated in the UK.

Authors:  Sue Ziebland; Alison Chapple; Julie Evans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Patient assessments of the most important medical decision during a hospitalization.

Authors:  Thomas V Perneger; Agathe Charvet-Bérard; Arnaud Perrier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.