Literature DB >> 17652180

Validation of the Subjective Numeracy Scale: effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations.

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, Dylan M Smith, Peter A Ubel, Angela Fagerlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a companion article, the authors describe the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS), a self-assessment of numerical aptitude and preferences for numbers that correlates strongly with objective numeracy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to validate the Subjective Numeracy Scale using measures of subjects' capacity to recall and comprehend complex risk statistics and to complete utility elicitations. RESEARCH
DESIGN: The study is composed of 3 general public surveys: 2 administered via the Web and 1 by paper and pencil. Subjects. Studies 1 and 3 surveyed 862 and 1234 people, respectively, recruited via a nationwide commercial Internet survey panel. Study 2 involved 245 people who completed paper-and-pencil surveys in a Veterans Administration hospital. MEASURES: The authors tested whether one's score on the SNS predicted the likelihood of correct recall and interpretation of risk information (studies 1 and 2A) or the likelihood of effectively completing a time tradeoff or person-tradeoff utility elicitation (studies 2B and 3). In Studies 1 and 2, the authors also tested whether an objective test of quantitative ability would predict performance.
RESULTS: In all studies, survey participants with higher SNS scores performed significantly better than other respondents. The predictive ability of the SNS approached that observed for objective numeracy.
CONCLUSIONS: The SNS effectively predicts both risk comprehension and completion of utility elicitations without requiring survey participants to complete time-consuming and stress-inducing mathematics tests. The authors encourage the use of the SNS in a variety of health services research contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17652180     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07303824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  132 in total

1.  Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents' understanding of a pediatric research study.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Terri Voepel-Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data.

Authors:  Bryan C Wallace; Larry A Allen; Christopher E Knoepke; Russell E Glasgow; Carmen L Lewis; Diane L Fairclough; Laura J Helmkamp; Monica D Fitzgerald; Wendy S Tzou; Daniel B Kramer; Paul D Varosy; Sanjaya K Gupta; John M Mandrola; Scott C Brancato; Pamela N Peterson; Daniel D Matlock
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Michael L Volk; Rachel S Tocco; Shawn J Pelletier; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Anna S F Lok
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Candace D McNaughton; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care.

Authors:  William B Brinkman; Jessica Hartl; Lauren M Rawe; Heidi Sucharew; Maria T Britto; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-11

Review 6.  Assessing patient preferences for treatment options and process of care in inflammatory bowel disease: a critical review of quantitative data.

Authors:  Meenakshi Bewtra; F Reed Johnson
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question?

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt; Damon M Seils; Li Lin; Daniel P Sulmasy; Alan B Astrow; Herbert I Hurwitz; Roger B Cohen; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Stanley J Chetcuti; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

9.  The influence of environmental hazard maps on risk beliefs, emotion, and health-related behavioral intentions.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.228

10.  Understanding the role of numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights.

Authors:  Isaac M Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.