Nita Khandelwal1, J Randall Curtis2,3, Vicki A Freedman4, Judith D Kasper5, Pedro Gozalo6, Ruth A Engelberg2,3, Joan M Teno3,7. 1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington. 2. 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington. 3. 3 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington. 4. 4 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. 5 Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland. 6. 6 Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health , Providence, Rhode Island. 7. 7 Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Harborview Medical Center , Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite its importance, little is known about the prevalence of, and factors associated with, end-of-life care that is consistent with patients' wishes. OBJECTIVE: To document the proportion of bereaved respondents who reported care inconsistent with patients' wishes and characterize the predictors of end-of-life care associated with inconsistent care. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of nationally representative survey data of persons aged >65 years. Settings/Subjects: Bereaved family members responding to the last month of life component of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Methods/Measurements: Bereaved family members assessed treatment decisions and their consistency with patients' wishes, unmet needs, and quality of care. We examined differences between patients receiving inconsistent versus consistent care. RESULTS: A total of 1212 family members were interviewed, representing (when weighted) 4.8 million decedents. Thirteen percent stated that care was inconsistent with decedent's wishes. Consistent care was unassociated with patient's sex, age, or race/ethnicity. Death at home was more likely to represent consistent care, and death in the hospital or nursing home was more likely to represent inconsistent care (p = 0.052). Respondents reporting inconsistent care were more likely to rate the quality of care as fair or poor (19.1% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001), reported more unmet needs for pain management (30.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.037), and reported more concerns with communication (29.8% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: One in eight respondents stated care in the last months of life was inconsistent with patients' wishes; such care was associated with worse ratings of care, pain management, and communication with clinicians.
BACKGROUND: Despite its importance, little is known about the prevalence of, and factors associated with, end-of-life care that is consistent with patients' wishes. OBJECTIVE: To document the proportion of bereaved respondents who reported care inconsistent with patients' wishes and characterize the predictors of end-of-life care associated with inconsistent care. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of nationally representative survey data of persons aged >65 years. Settings/Subjects: Bereaved family members responding to the last month of life component of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Methods/Measurements: Bereaved family members assessed treatment decisions and their consistency with patients' wishes, unmet needs, and quality of care. We examined differences between patients receiving inconsistent versus consistent care. RESULTS: A total of 1212 family members were interviewed, representing (when weighted) 4.8 million decedents. Thirteen percent stated that care was inconsistent with decedent's wishes. Consistent care was unassociated with patient's sex, age, or race/ethnicity. Death at home was more likely to represent consistent care, and death in the hospital or nursing home was more likely to represent inconsistent care (p = 0.052). Respondents reporting inconsistent care were more likely to rate the quality of care as fair or poor (19.1% vs. 4.8%, p < 0.001), reported more unmet needs for pain management (30.5% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.037), and reported more concerns with communication (29.8% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: One in eight respondents stated care in the last months of life was inconsistent with patients' wishes; such care was associated with worse ratings of care, pain management, and communication with clinicians.
Entities:
Keywords:
communication; end-of-life care; goals of care; palliative care
Authors: J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Julia Gold; Paul S Ciechanowski; Sarah E Shannon; Nita Khandelwal; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Nancy L Keating; Tracy A Balboni; Ursula A Matulonis; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nita Khandelwal; Erin K Kross; Ruth A Engelberg; Norma B Coe; Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Julie P W Bynum; Natalie E Leland; Susan C Miller; Nancy E Morden; Thomas Scupp; David C Goodman; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Natalie C Ernecoff; Sheryl Zimmerman; Susan L Mitchell; Mi-Kyung Song; Feng-Chang Lin; Kathryn L Wessell; Laura C Hanson Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Claire A Richards; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Lynn F Reinke; Leslie L Taylor; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Joan M Teno; Pedro Gozalo; Amal N Trivedi; Jennifer Bunker; Julie Lima; Jessica Ogarek; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thanh H Neville; Joshua F Wiley; Miramar Kardouh; J Randall Curtis; Myrtle C Yamamoto; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Jill M Steiner; Alysha Dhami; Crystal E Brown; Karen K Stout; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; James N Kirkpatrick Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 2.778