Literature DB >> 19730257

Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs.

Neil A Halpern1, Stephen M Pastores.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolving role, patterns of use, and costs of critical care medicine in the United States from 2000 to 2005.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of data from the Hospital Cost Report Information System (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland).
SETTING: Nonfederal, acute care hospitals with critical care medicine beds in the United States.
SUBJECTS: None.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We analyzed hospital and critical care medicine beds, bed types, days, occupancy rates, payer mix (Medicare and Medicaid), and costs. Critical care medicine costs were compared with national cost indexes. Between 2000 and 2005, the total number of U.S. hospitals with critical care medicine beds decreased by 12.2% (from 3,586 to 3,150). Although the number of hospital beds decreased by 4.2% (from 655,785 to 628,409), both hospital days and occupancy rates increased by 5.1% (from 145.1 to 152.5 million) and 13.7% (from 59% to 67%), respectively. Critical care medicine beds increased by 6.5% (from 88,252 to 93,955), days by 10.6% (from 21.0 to 23.2 million), and occupancy rates by 4.5% (from 65% to 68%). The majority (90%) of critical care medicine beds were classified as intensive care, premature/neonatal, and coronary care unit beds. The percentage of critical care medicine days used by Medicare decreased by 3.8% (from 37.9% to 36.5%) compared with an increase of 15.5% (from 14.5% to 16.8%) by Medicaid. From 2000 to 2005, critical care medicine costs per day increased by 30.4% (from $2698 to $3518). Although annual critical care medicine costs increased by 44.2% (from $56.6 to $81.7 billion), the proportion of hospital costs and national health expenditures allocated to critical care medicine decreased by 1.6% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the proportion of the gross domestic product used by critical care medicine increased by 13.7%. In 2005, critical care medicine costs represented 13.4% of hospital costs, 4.1% of national health expenditures, and 0.66% of the gross domestic product.
CONCLUSIONS: Critical care medicine continues to grow in a shrinking U.S. hospital system. The critical care medicine payer mix is evolving, with Medicaid increasing in its percentage of critical care medicine use. Critical care medicine is more cost controlled than other healthcare indexes, but is still using an increasing percentage of the gross domestic product. Our updated and comprehensive critical care medicine use and cost analysis provides a contemporary benchmark for the strategic planning of critical care medicine services within the U.S. healthcare system.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730257     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b090d0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  233 in total

1.  Long-term acute care hospital utilization after critical illness.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Nicole M Benson; Dina Appleby; Shannon S Carson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  [Intensive care capacities in Germany: provision and usage between 1991 and 2009].

Authors:  R Thattil; D Klepzig; M Schuster
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Comparison of APACHE III, APACHE IV, SAPS 3, and MPM0III and influence of resuscitation status on model performance.

Authors:  Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Clinical and investigative critical care medicine in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuaki Shime
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Effect of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Grayson L Baird; Ashley Szabo Eltorai; Terrance T Healey; Saurabh Agarwal; Corey E Ventetuolo; Thomas J Martin; Jane Chen; Layla Kazemi; Catherine A Keable; Emily Diaz; Joshua Pangborn; Jordan Fox; Kevin Connors; Frank W Sellke; Jack A Elias; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Hospital-Level Changes in Adult ICU Bed Supply in the United States.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Christopher W Seymour; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Economic Evaluation of a Patient-Directed Music Intervention for ICU Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilatory Support.

Authors:  Linda L Chlan; Annette Heiderscheit; Debra J Skaar; Marjorie V Neidecker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and functional disability in survivors of critical illness in the BRAIN-ICU study: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  James C Jackson; Pratik P Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Nathan E Brummel; Jennifer L Thompson; Christopher G Hughes; Brenda T Pun; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi K Shintani; Ramona O Hopkins; Gordon R Bernard; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 9.  Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Jordan; Louise Rose; Katie N Dainty; Jane Noyes; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-04

10.  ICU Readmissions: Good for Reflection on Performance But Not a Reflection of Quality.

Authors:  Thomas Bice
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.