Literature DB >> 11532588

Validation of Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview.

J M Teno1, B Clarridge, V Casey, S Edgman-Levitan, J Fowler.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Toolkit After-Death Bereaved Family Member Interview to measure quality of care at the end of life from the unique perspective of family members. The survey included proposed problem scores (a count of the opportunity to improve the quality of care) and scales. Data were collected through a retrospective telephone survey with a family member who was interviewed between 3 and 6 months after the death of the patient. The setting was an outpatient hospice service, a consortium of nursing homes, and a hospital in New England. One hundred fifty-six family members from across these settings participated. The 8 proposed domains of care, as represented by problem scores or scales, were based on a conceptual model of patient-focused, family-centered medical care. The survey design emphasized face validity in order to provide actionable information to health care providers. A correlational and factor analysis was undertaken of the 8 proposed problem scores or scales. Cronbach's alpha scores varied from 0.58 to 0.87, with two problem scores (each of which had only 3 survey items) having a low alpha of 0.58. The mean item-to-total correlations for the other problem scores varied from 0.36 to 0.69, and the mean item-to-item correlations were between 0.32 and 0.70. The proposed problem scores or scales, with the exception of closure and advance care planning, demonstrated a moderate correlation (i.e., from 0.44 to 0.52) with the overall rating of satisfaction (as measured by a five-point, "excellent" to "poor" scale). Family members of persons who died with hospice service reported fewer problems in each of the six domains of medical care, gave a higher rating of the quality of care, and reported higher self-efficacy in caring for their loved ones. These results indicate that 7 of the 8 proposed problem scores or scales demonstrated psychometric properties that warrant further testing. The domain of closure demonstrated a poor correlation with overall satisfaction and requires further work. This survey could provide information to help guide quality improvement efforts to enhance the care of the dying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11532588     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00331-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  71 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.

Authors:  Vincent Mor
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  "You can't always get what you want"--or can you?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; David Dosa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Hispanic language version of the family evaluation of hospice care.

Authors:  Jason Portenoy; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Quality of care and quality of dying in nursing homes: two measurement models.

Authors:  Sarah A Thompson; Marjorie Bott; Byron Gajewski; Virginia P Tilden
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Geriatric palliative care in long-term care settings with a focus on nursing homes.

Authors:  Mary Ersek; Joan G Carpenter
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Concordance between Goals of Care and Treatment Decisions for Persons with Dementia.

Authors:  Natalie C Ernecoff; Sheryl Zimmerman; Susan L Mitchell; Mi-Kyung Song; Feng-Chang Lin; Kathryn L Wessell; Laura C Hanson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  Associations between Race and Dementia Status and the Quality of End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Luth; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Timing of Survey Administration After Hospice Patient Death: Stability of Bereaved Respondents.

Authors:  Eleanor L DiBiasio; Melissa A Clark; Pedro L Gozalo; Carol Spence; David J Casarett; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Lois Downey; J Randall Curtis; William E Lafferty; Jerald R Herting; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Is Care for the Dying Improving in the United States?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Vicki A Freedman; Judith D Kasper; Pedro Gozalo; Vincent Mor
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.