Literature DB >> 28661754

Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule.

Jeremy Sugarman1.   

Abstract

The long-standing overarching policy governing research with human subjects conducted and supported by most federal agencies and departments in the United States, known as the Common Rule, has recently been revised, with most requirements slated to become effective in 2018. Although there are multiple alterations to the current regulations, some of the most significant changes aim to enhance consent for research. While some of the particular provisions in this regard will be easy to apply and promise to help meet this goal, others may be more challenging to implement despite their intuitive appeal. In this article, I examine some of the provisions in the revised Common Rule that relate to consent: (1) new required consent elements; (2) the goal of comprehension in the consent process; (3) consent forms; and (4) broad consent. By raising issues about these provisions now and suggesting possible ways to overcome their potential shortfalls, the hope is that future efforts can be taken to help clarify and appropriately implement them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consent; regulation; research ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28661754     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  11 in total

1.  Informational needs for participation in bioequivalence studies: the perspectives of experienced volunteers.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Saranyapin Potikanond; Mingkwan Na Takuathung; Wutigri Nimlamool; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Influence of Dispositional Optimism on Ethically Salient Research Perspectives: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Sangeeta Mondal; Tenzin Tsungmey; Katie Ryan; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2022-05

3.  Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight.

Authors:  Effy Vayena; Alessandro Blasimme
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Self-directed multimedia process for delivering participant informed consent.

Authors:  Niamh Chapman; Rebekah McWhirter; Matthew K Armstrong; Ricardo Fonseca; Julie A Campbell; Mark Nelson; Martin G Schultz; James E Sharman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  What information and the extent of information research participants need in informed consent forms: a multi-country survey.

Authors:  Juntra Karbwang; Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Cristina E Torres; Edlyn B Jimenez; Gurpreet Kaur; Roli Mathur; Eti N Sholikhah; Chandanie Wanigatunge; Chih-Shung Wong; Kwanchanok Yimtae; Murnilina Abdul Malek; Liyana Ahamad Fouzi; Aisyah Ali; Beng Z Chan; Madawa Chandratilake; Shoen C Chiew; Melvyn Y C Chin; Manori Gamage; Irene Gitek; Mohammad Hakimi; Narwani Hussin; Mohd F A Jamil; Pavithra Janarsan; Madarina Julia; Suman Kanungo; Panduka Karunanayake; Sattian Kollanthavelu; Kian K Kong; Bing-Ling Kueh; Ragini Kulkarni; Paul P Kumaran; Ranjith Kumarasiri; Wei H Lim; Xin J Lim; Fatihah Mahmud; Jacinto B V Mantaring; Siti M Md Ali; Nurain Mohd Noor; Kopalasuntharam Muhunthan; Elanngovan Nagandran; Maisarah Noor; Kim H Ooi; Jebananthy A Pradeepan; Ahmad H Sadewa; Nilakshi Samaranayake; Shalini Sri Ranganathan; Wasanthi Subasingha; Sivasangari Subramaniam; Nadirah Sulaiman; Ju F Tay; Leh H Teng; Mei M Tew; Thipaporn Tharavanij; Peter S K Tok; Jayanie Weeratna; Tri Wibawa; Renu Wickremasinghe; Phanthipha Wongwai; Subhash Yadav
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Azure Dominique Grant; Gary Isaac Wolf; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Chanchai Traivaree; Charnunnut Tiyapsane; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information.

Authors:  Lydia A Bazzano; Jaquail Durant; Paula Rhode Brantley
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2021

9.  Experiences of parents whose children participated in a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Nike Franke; Jennifer Rogers; Trecia Wouldes; Kim Ward; Gavin Brown; Monique Jonas; Peter Keegan; Jane Harding
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.318

10.  Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Deborah M Layman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.