Literature DB >> 33828429

A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information.

Lydia A Bazzano1,2,3, Jaquail Durant3, Paula Rhode Brantley4.   

Abstract

Background: The concept of informed consent has evolved significantly with regard to both the practice of medicine and research conducted with human volunteers. Yet the process of informed consent used in clinical research and the lengthy consent documents that are difficult to comprehend have been criticized.
Methods: We review the history of informed consent as a legal and regulatory concept and the intended impact of the new key information section, a requirement that was introduced in the 2017 revisions to the Common Rule.
Results: The key information section is intended to be a concise and focused presentation at the beginning of the informed consent document that facilitates potential participants' comprehension of the research. However, the lack of regulatory guidance regarding content and length has been problematic. To avoid the risk of noncompliance, many institutions have sought safe harbor by following the limited format guidelines included in the preamble to the revisions to the Common Rule.
Conclusion: Research examining formats for the key information section and aids to increasing potential participants' understanding of a research project should be conducted to ensure that the new regulations achieve the original intent rather than simply lengthening an already lengthy paper document. In addition, the human research protections community should evaluate whether the key information section increases research participants' understanding of what they will be undertaking in a particular study. ©2021 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consent forms; ethics committees–research; informed consent

Year:  2021        PMID: 33828429      PMCID: PMC7993430          DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ochsner J        ISSN: 1524-5012


  20 in total

1.  Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level.

Authors:  Daniel R Young; Donald T Hooker; Fred E Freeberg
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1990 May-Jun

2.  Improving informed consent: the medium is not the message.

Authors:  Patricia Agre; Frances A Campbell; Barbara D Goldman; Maria L Boccia; Nancy Kass; Laurence B McCullough; Jon F Merz; Suzanne M Miller; Jim Mintz; Bruce Rapkin; Jeremy Sugarman; James Sorenson; Donna Wirshing
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

3.  Empirical research on informed consent. An annotated bibliography.

Authors:  J Sugarman; D C McCrory; D Powell; A Krasny; B Adams; E Ball; C Cassell
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2009-06

5.  A brief historical and theoretical perspective on patient autonomy and medical decision making: Part I: The beneficence model.

Authors:  Jonathan F Will
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Key Information in the New Common Rule: Can It Save Research Consent?

Authors:  Nancy M P King
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Comprehension and Choice Under the Revised Common Rule: Improving Informed Consent by Offering Reasons Why Some Enroll in Research and Others Do Not.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Kathryn M Porter; Seema K Shah; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember?

Authors:  R J Hekkenberg; J C Irish; L E Rotstein; D H Brown; P J Gullane
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-06

9.  Ethics and clinical research.

Authors:  H K Beecher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Rescuing Informed Consent: How the new "Key Information" and "Reasonable Person" Provisions in the Revised U.S. Common Rule open the door to long Overdue Informed Consent Disclosure Improvements and why we need to walk Through that door.

Authors:  Mark Yarborough
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  2 in total

1.  Consent Builder: an innovative tool for creating research informed consent documents.

Authors:  Katherine A Sward; Rene Enriquez; Jeri Burr; Julie Ozier; Megan Roebuck; Carrie Elliott; J Michael Dean
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2022-07-27

2.  Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society.

Authors:  Frederik G Dikkers; Michel R M San Giorgi; Rico N P M Rinkel; Marc Remacle; Antoine Giovanni; Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Riaz Seedat; Guillermo Campos; Guri S Sandhu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.