Literature DB >> 15537577

Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature.

Sharon McDonald1, Debbie Saslow, Marianne H Alciati.   

Abstract

Clinical breast examination (CBE) seeks to detect breast abnormalities or evaluate patient reports of symptoms to find palpable breast cancers at an earlier stage of progression, when treatment is more effective and treatment options are greater than for later stage disease. Evidence suggests that, for some women, CBE can be an important complement to mammography in the earlier detection of breast cancer; CBE identifies some cancers missed by mammography and provides an important screening tool among women for whom mammography is not recommended or women who do not receive high-quality screening mammography according to recommended guidelines. But CBE performance and reporting approaches are inconsistent. Health care providers indicate that they are not confident in their CBE skills and would welcome training. Studies demonstrate that training can enhance CBE performance, measured in terms of execution of CBE components and accuracy. This literature review provides evidence to the extent that it is available, to support the specific recommendations of Saslow, et al. for optimizing CBE performance and reporting and to guide further research on CBE performance characteristics, reporting systems, barriers to high-quality CBE performance, and training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15537577     DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin        ISSN: 0007-9235            Impact factor:   508.702


  26 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening, diagnostic accuracy and health care policies.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Urbain
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Detection and description of small breast masses by residents trained using a standardized clinical breast exam curriculum.

Authors:  Elizabeth Steiner; Donald F Austin; Nancy C Prouser
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cultural beliefs and clinical breast examination in Hmong American women: the crucial role of modesty.

Authors:  Hee Yun Lee; Suzanne Vang
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

4.  Personalizing post-treatment cancer care: a cross-sectional survey of the needs and preferences of well survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Y Kwan; J Croke; T Panzarella; K Ubhi; A Fyles; A Koch; R Dinniwell; W Levin; D McCready; C Chung; F Liu; J L Bender
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Validation of Different Techniques in Physical Examination of Breast.

Authors:  Mahesh Sultania; Kamal Kataria; Anurag Srivastava; Mahesh Chandra Misra; Rajinder Parshad; Anita Dhar; Smriti Hari; Sanjay Thulkar
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Rescuing the Clinical Breast Examination: Advances in Classifying Technique and Assessing Physician Competency.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Calvin Kwan; Rebbeca D Ray; Rachel Yudkowsky; John R Boulet; William C McGaghie; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Multimodality approach to classifying hand utilization for the clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Shlomi Laufer; Elaine R Cohen; Anne-Lise D Maag; Calvin Kwan; Barry Vanveen; Carla M Pugh
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2014

9.  Enhanced resting-state dynamics of the hemoglobin signal as a novel biomarker for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Harry L Graber; Rabah Al abdi; Yong Xu; Armand P Asarian; Peter J Pappas; Lisa Dresner; Naresh Patel; Kuppuswamy Jagarlamundi; William B Solomon; Randall L Barbour
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Evaluation of Simulated Clinical Breast Exam Motion Patterns Using Marker-Less Video Tracking.

Authors:  David P Azari; Carla M Pugh; Shlomi Laufer; Calvin Kwan; Chia-Hsiung Chen; Thomas Y Yen; Yu Hen Hu; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.888

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.