Literature DB >> 28656455

Malignancy Detection on Mammography Using Dual Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Genetically Discovered False Color Input Enhancement.

Philip Teare1, Michael Fishman2, Oshra Benzaquen3, Eyal Toledano1, Eldad Elnekave4,5.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in the US and the third highest cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Regular mammography screening has been attributed with doubling the rate of early cancer detection over the past three decades, yet estimates of mammographic accuracy in the hands of experienced radiologists remain suboptimal with sensitivity ranging from 62 to 87% and specificity from 75 to 91%. Advances in machine learning (ML) in recent years have demonstrated capabilities of image analysis which often surpass those of human observers. Here we present two novel techniques to address inherent challenges in the application of ML to the domain of mammography. We describe the use of genetic search of image enhancement methods, leading us to the use of a novel form of false color enhancement through contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), as a method to optimize mammographic feature representation. We also utilize dual deep convolutional neural networks at different scales, for classification of full mammogram images and derivative patches combined with a random forest gating network as a novel architectural solution capable of discerning malignancy with a specificity of 0.91 and a specificity of 0.80. To our knowledge, this represents the first automatic stand-alone mammography malignancy detection algorithm with sensitivity and specificity performance similar to that of expert radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Machine learning; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28656455      PMCID: PMC5537100          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9993-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  18 in total

1.  How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography?

Authors:  Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Barbara Cavanaugh; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  John Arevalo; Fabio A González; Raúl Ramos-Pollán; Jose L Oliveira; Miguel Angel Guevara Lopez
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

Authors:  T W Freer; M J Ulissey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades.

Authors:  László Tabár; Bedrich Vitak; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Anders Cohen; Tibor Tot; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; Johan Rosell; Helena Fohlin; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Mucahit Cevik; Oguzhan Alagoz; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Natasha K Stout; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Scott D Ramsey; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Screening breast ultrasound: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Rachel F Brem; Megan J Lenihan; Jennifer Lieberman; Jessica Torrente
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Breast density: clinical implications and assessment methods.

Authors:  Nicole S Winkler; Sughra Raza; Meaghan Mackesy; Robyn L Birdwell
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

10.  Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Guibo Xing; Joann G Elmore; Heejung Bang; Steven L Chen; Karen K Lindfors; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning in breast radiology: current progress and future directions.

Authors:  William C Ou; Dogan Polat; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  An interpretable classifier for high-resolution breast cancer screening images utilizing weakly supervised localization.

Authors:  Yiqiu Shen; Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Kangning Liu; Sudarshini Tyagi; Laura Heacock; S Gene Kim; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Fracture Detection and Localization on Wrist Radiographs.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Yiting Li; Pooja Jagmohan; David Sia; Vincent Ern Yao Chan; Robby T Tan
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence and convolution neural networks assessing mammographic images: a narrative literature review.

Authors:  Dennis Jay Wong; Ziba Gandomkar; Wan-Jing Wu; Guijing Zhang; Wushuang Gao; Xiaoying He; Yunuo Wang; Warren Reed
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-03-05

5.  Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Nan Wu; Jason Phang; Jungkyu Park; Yiqiu Shen; Zhe Huang; Masha Zorin; Stanislaw Jastrzebski; Thibault Fevry; Joe Katsnelson; Eric Kim; Stacey Wolfson; Ujas Parikh; Sushma Gaddam; Leng Leng Young Lin; Kara Ho; Joshua D Weinstein; Beatriu Reig; Yiming Gao; Hildegard Toth; Kristine Pysarenko; Alana Lewin; Jiyon Lee; Krystal Airola; Eralda Mema; Stephanie Chung; Esther Hwang; Naziya Samreen; S Gene Kim; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Annotation of enhanced radiographs for medical image retrieval with deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Obioma Pelka; Felix Nensa; Christoph M Friedrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in oncology.

Authors:  Hideyuki Shimizu; Keiichi I Nakayama
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  Privacy-Preserving Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Reihaneh Torkzadehmahani; Reza Nasirigerdeh; David B Blumenthal; Tim Kacprowski; Markus List; Julian Matschinske; Julian Spaeth; Nina Kerstin Wenke; Jan Baumbach
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 1.800

9.  Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?

Authors:  Bertalan Meskó; Gergely Hetényi; Zsuzsanna Győrffy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Automated Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Mammograms of Various Densities via Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yong Joon Suh; Jaewon Jung; Bum-Joo Cho
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.