Literature DB >> 33937780

Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Fracture Detection and Localization on Wrist Radiographs.

Yee Liang Thian1, Yiting Li1, Pooja Jagmohan1, David Sia1, Vincent Ern Yao Chan1, Robby T Tan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility and performance of an object detection convolutional neural network (CNN) for fracture detection and localization on wrist radiographs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained with waiver of consent for this retrospective study. A total of 7356 wrist radiographic studies were extracted from a hospital picture archiving and communication system. Radiologists annotated all radius and ulna fractures with bounding boxes. The dataset was split into training (90%) and validation (10%) sets and used to train fracture localization models for frontal and lateral images. Inception-ResNet Faster R-CNN architecture was implemented as a deep learning model. The models were tested on an unseen test set of 524 consecutive emergency department wrist radiographic studies with two radiologists in consensus as the reference standard. Per-fracture, per-image (ie, per-view), and per-study sensitivity and specificity were determined. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was performed.
RESULTS: The model detected and correctly localized 310 (91.2%) of 340 and 236 (96.3%) of 245 of all radius and ulna fractures on the frontal and lateral views, respectively. The per-image sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 95.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.4%, 97.8%), 82.5% (95% CI: 77.4%, 86.8%), and 0.918 (95% CI: 0.894, 0.941), respectively, for the frontal view and 96.7% (95% CI: 93.6%, 98.6%), 86.4% (95% CI: 81.9%, 90.2%), and 0.933 (95% CI: 0.912, 0.954), respectively, for the lateral view. The per-study sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 98.1% (95% CI: 95.6%, 99.4%), 72.9% (95% CI: 67.1%, 78.2%), and 0.895 (95% CI: 0.870, 0.920), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ability of an object detection CNN to detect and localize radius and ulna fractures on wrist radiographs with high sensitivity and specificity was demonstrated.© RSNA, 2019. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33937780      PMCID: PMC8017412          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  14 in total

Review 1.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  One-shot learning of object categories.

Authors:  Li Fei-Fei; Rob Fergus; Pietro Perona
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Radiology: Opportunities, Challenges, Pitfalls, and Criteria for Success.

Authors:  James H Thrall; Xiang Li; Quanzheng Li; Cinthia Cruz; Synho Do; Keith Dreyer; James Brink
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Deep Learning at Chest Radiography: Automated Classification of Pulmonary Tuberculosis by Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani; Baskaran Sundaram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.

Authors:  Varun Gulshan; Lily Peng; Marc Coram; Martin C Stumpe; Derek Wu; Arunachalam Narayanaswamy; Subhashini Venugopalan; Kasumi Widner; Tom Madams; Jorge Cuadros; Ramasamy Kim; Rajiv Raman; Philip C Nelson; Jessica L Mega; Dale R Webster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  D H Kim; T MacKinnon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Performance of a Deep-Learning Neural Network Model in Assessing Skeletal Maturity on Pediatric Hand Radiographs.

Authors:  David B Larson; Matthew C Chen; Matthew P Lungren; Safwan S Halabi; Nicholas V Stence; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Malignancy Detection on Mammography Using Dual Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Genetically Discovered False Color Input Enhancement.

Authors:  Philip Teare; Michael Fishman; Oshra Benzaquen; Eyal Toledano; Eldad Elnekave
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs.

Authors:  Jakub Olczak; Niklas Fahlberg; Atsuto Maki; Ali Sharif Razavian; Anthony Jilert; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Seok Won Chung; Seung Seog Han; Ji Whan Lee; Kyung-Soo Oh; Na Ra Kim; Jong Pil Yoon; Joon Yub Kim; Sung Hoon Moon; Jieun Kwon; Hyo-Jin Lee; Young-Min Noh; Youngjun Kim
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  15 in total

1.  Detecting Distal Radial Fractures from Wrist Radiographs Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network with an Accuracy Comparable to Hand Orthopedic Surgeons.

Authors:  Takeshi Suzuki; Satoshi Maki; Takahiro Yamazaki; Hiromasa Wakita; Yasunari Toguchi; Manato Horii; Tomonori Yamauchi; Koui Kawamura; Masaaki Aramomi; Hiroshi Sugiyama; Yusuke Matsuura; Takeshi Yamashita; Sumihisa Orita; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Artificial Intelligence in Fracture Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Y L Kuo; Conrad Harrison; Terry-Ann Curran; Benjamin Jones; Alexander Freethy; David Cussons; Max Stewart; Gary S Collins; Dominic Furniss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 29.146

3.  Deep learning detection of subtle fractures using staged algorithms to mimic radiologist search pattern.

Authors:  Mark Ren; Paul H Yi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine as a strategic valuable tool.

Authors:  Andreas Larentzakis; Nik Lygeros
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-02-17

5.  Hanging protocol optimization of lumbar spine radiographs with machine learning.

Authors:  Gene Kitamura
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.128

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence development in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging: best ideas to adapt from adults.

Authors:  Michael M Moore; Ramesh S Iyer; Nabeel I Sarwani; Raymond W Sze
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  A deep-learning method using computed tomography scout images for estimating patient body weight.

Authors:  Shota Ichikawa; Misaki Hamada; Hiroyuki Sugimori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  AI-based detection and classification of distal radius fractures using low-effort data labeling: evaluation of applicability and effect of training set size.

Authors:  Patrick Tobler; Joshy Cyriac; Balazs K Kovacs; Verena Hofmann; Raphael Sexauer; Fabiano Paciolla; Bram Stieltjes; Felix Amsler; Anna Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Biomedical Ontologies to Guide AI Development in Radiology.

Authors:  Ross W Filice; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.903

Review 10.  [Artificial intelligence in image evaluation and diagnosis].

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Mentzel
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 0.323

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.