Literature DB >> 17503429

Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?

Nancy Breen1, Kathleen A Cronin, Helen I Meissner, Stephen H Taplin, Florence K Tangka, Jasmin A Tiro, Timothy S McNeel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely screening with mammography can prevent a substantial number of deaths from breast cancer. The objective of this brief was to ascertain whether recent use of mammography has dropped nationally.
METHODS: The authors assessed the trend in mammography rates from 1987 through 2005. Then, they used the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) estimates to characterize trends and current patterns in mammography use.
RESULTS: After robust, rapid increases in reported use of mammography by women in the U.S. since 1987, estimates from the 2005 NHIS showed a decline compared with 2000 (from 70% to 66%). Although it was small, this decline may be cause for concern, because it signals a change in direction.
CONCLUSIONS: This report establishes for the nation what already has been observed in some local data. The results confirmed that the use of mammography may be falling. This change needs to be monitored carefully and also may call for intervention. Published 2007 by the American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503429     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  77 in total

1.  Patient Barriers to Mammography Identified During a Reminder Program.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  State-based estimates of mammography screening rates based on information from two health surveys.

Authors:  William W Davis; Van L Parsons; Dawei Xie; Nathaniel Schenker; Machell Town; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Screening mammography use among current, former, and never hormone therapy users may not explain recent declines in breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Rod Walker; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Walter Clinton; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Influence of health insurance coverage on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care settings.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Jean O'Malley; David I Buckley; Motomi Mori; David A Lieberman; Lyle J Fagnan; James Wallace; Betty Liu; Cynthia Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Susan Harvey; Aimee M Gallagher; Martha Nolan; Christine M Hughes
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Medicaid Beneficiaries: The Role of Physician Payment and Managed Care.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Bassam Dahman; Anushree Vichare; Cathy J Bradley
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in the decline in invasive breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Moving mammogram-reluctant women to screening: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Milagros C Rosal; Nancy LaPelle; Caroline Cranos
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.