Literature DB >> 24638119

Use of interactive voice response to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Hannah Cohen-Cline1, Karen J Wernli, Susan C Bradford, Mary Boles-Hall, David C Grossman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Only 63% of the US population aged 50-75 years is adherent with recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines. Efforts are needed to increase screening for CRC.
METHODS: We evaluated a quality improvement intervention conducted in 2010 at Group Health in Washington State to assess the use of interactive voice response (IVR) systems to improve CRC screening. Eligible members were aged 50-81 years, received primary care from a contracted physician, and were due for CRC screening. A total of 13,279 members were identified and randomly assigned to either: (1) an intervention with IVR to encourage CRC screening (n=10,000), or (2) usual care (n=3279). The primary outcome was receipt of any recommended CRC screening test at 6 months postintervention or index date. We used Cox proportional hazards to model time until receipt of CRC screening at 6 months.
RESULTS: Adherence to CRC screening was 10.0% in the intervention arm and 7.8% in the usual care arm at 6 months. Randomization to the IVR intervention arm was associated with a 32% increased likelihood of receiving CRC screening (hazard ratio=1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.14, 1.52) compared with usual care. The difference in CRC screening uptake was apparent by 3 months and persisted for 12 months postintervention (log-rank test, P=0.0012). DISCUSSION: Our analysis provides "real-world" evidence that IVR is effective when delivered by a commercial health plan, and may be a useful tool for increasing adherence to screening guidelines among patients outside an integrated care practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24638119     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  11 in total

1.  Interactive Voice Response Calls to Promote Smoking Cessation after Hospital Discharge: Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Nancy A Rigotti; Yuchiao Chang; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Sandra J Japuntich; Elyse R Park; Hilary A Tindle; Douglas E Levy; Zachary Z Reid; Joanna Streck; Timothy Gomperts; Jennifer H K Kelley; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veda Zabih; Alyssa Kahane; Natalya E O'Neill; Noah Ivers; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Assessment of an interactive voice response system for identifying falls in a statewide sample of older adults.

Authors:  Steven M Albert; Jennifer King; Robert M Keene
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Effectiveness of reminder strategies on cancer screening adherence: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin Cs Wong; Jessica Yl Ching; Junjie Huang; John Ct Wong; Thomas Yt Lam; Victor Cw Chan; Simpson Kc Ng; Zero Hui; Arthur Kc Luk; Justin Cy Wu; Francis Kl Chan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  A stepped randomized trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in a nationwide sample of U.S. Veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J Del Junco; Sharon P Coan; Caitlin C Murphy; Scott T Walters; Robert H Friedman; Lori A Bastian; Deborah A Fisher; David R Lairson; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.261

8.  An Automated Telephone Call System Improves the Reach and Cost-effectiveness of Panel Management Outreach for Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kristin S Gagliardi; Sara Coleman; Gina Intinarelli; Leah Karliner; Nicole Appelle; Brian Taylor; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2020 Apr/Jun

9.  Does self-reported symptom questionnaire play a role in nonadherence to colonoscopy for risk-increased population in the Tianjin colorectal cancer screening programme?

Authors:  Lizhong Zhao; Xiaorui Zhang; Yongjie Chen; Yuan Wang; Weihua Zhang; Wenli Lu
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  Marita S Fønhus; Therese K Dalsbø; Marit Johansen; Atle Fretheim; Helge Skirbekk; Signe A Flottorp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.