Literature DB >> 28654959

Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.

Alexander T Sandhu1,2,3, Paul A Heidenreich1,3, Jay Bhattacharya2,3, M Kate Bundorf3,4.   

Abstract

Importance: Noninvasive testing and coronary angiography are used to evaluate patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, but their effects on outcomes are uncertain. Objective: To determine whether cardiovascular testing-noninvasive imaging or coronary angiography-is associated with changes in the rates of coronary revascularization or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) admission in patients who present to the ED with chest pain without initial findings of ischemia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used weekday (Monday-Thursday) vs weekend (Friday-Sunday) presentation as an instrument to adjust for unobserved case-mix variation (selection bias) between 2011 and 2012. National claims data (Truven MarketScan) was used. The data included a total of 926 633 privately insured patients ages 18 to 64 years who presented to the ED with chest pain without initial diagnosis consistent with acute ischemia. Exposures: Noninvasive testing or coronary angiography within 2 days or 30 days of presentation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) and AMI admission at 7, 30, 180, and 365 days. The secondary end points were coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting in those who underwent angiography.
Results: The patients were ages 18 to 64 years with an average age of 44.4 years. A total of 536 197 patients (57.9%) were women. Patients who received testing (224 973) had increased risk at baseline and had greater risk of AMI admission than those who did not receive testing (701 660) (0.35% vs 0.14% at 30 days). Weekday patients (571 988) had similar baseline comorbidities to weekend patients (354 645) but were more likely to receive testing. After risk factor adjustment, testing within 30 days was associated with a significant increase in coronary angiography (36.5 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 21.0-52.0) and revascularization (22.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, 10.6-35.0) at 1 year but no significant change in AMI admissions (7.8 per 1000 patients tested; 95% CI, -1.4 to 17.0). Testing within 2 days was also associated with a significant increase in coronary revascularization but no difference in AMI admissions. Conclusions and Relevance: Cardiac testing in patients with chest pain was associated with increased downstream testing and treatment without a reduction in AMI admissions, suggesting that routine testing may not be warranted. Further research into whether specific high-risk subgroups benefit from testing is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28654959      PMCID: PMC5710427          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  22 in total

1.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain.

Authors:  Rita F Redberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

Authors:  J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Optimal timing of intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: insights from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines) Registry.

Authors:  Jason W Ryan; Eric D Peterson; Anita Y Chen; Matthew T Roe; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher P Cannon; Peter B Berger; Jorge F Saucedo; Elizabeth R DeLong; Sharon-Lise Normand; Charles V Pollack; David J Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I.

Authors:  C W Hamm; B U Goldmann; C Heeschen; G Kreymann; J Berger; T Meinertz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T.

Authors:  Radha Bholasingh; Jan Hein Cornel; Otto Kamp; Jan P van Straalen; Gerard T Sanders; Jan G P Tijssen; Victor A W M Umans; Cees A Visser; Robbert J de Winter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Immediate exercise testing to evaluate low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; Deborah B Diercks; William R Lewis; Samuel D Turnipseed
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Impact of stress testing on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes for low-risk patients with chest pain admitted to floor telemetry beds.

Authors:  Grace Wu Chan; Frank D Sites; Frances S Shofer; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Hospital variation in the use of noninvasive cardiac imaging and its association with downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Kyan C Safavi; Shu-Xia Li; Kumar Dharmarajan; Arjun K Venkatesh; Kelly M Strait; Haiqun Lin; Timothy J Lowe; Reza Fazel; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Weekend versus weekday admission and mortality from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  William J Kostis; Kitaw Demissie; Stephen W Marcella; Yu-Hsuan Shao; Alan C Wilson; Abel E Moreyra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  18 in total

1.  Provocative testing for low-risk chest pain patients, must we continue?

Authors:  James Booth; J Jeremy Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Evaluation of Outpatient Cardiac Stress Testing After Emergency Department Encounters for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Shaw Natsui; Benjamin C Sun; Ernest Shen; Yi-Lin Wu; Rita F Redberg; Ming-Sum Lee; Maros Ferencik; Chengyi Zheng; Aniket A Kawatkar; Michael K Gould; Adam L Sharp
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Patients Visiting Multiple Emergency Departments: Patterns, Costs, and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Todd W Lyons; Karen L Olson; Nathan P Palmer; Reed Horwitz; Kenneth D Mandl; Andrew M Fine
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Utilization of stress testing for low-risk patients with chest discomfort in the emergency department.

Authors:  Sheela Krishnan; Rachael Venn; Daniel M Blumenthal; Vijeta Bhambhani; Henry Gewirtz; Rory B Weiner; John T Nagurney; Jason H Wasfy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Does Hospital Admission/Observation for Chest Pain Improve Patient Outcomes after Emergency Department Evaluation for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Authors:  Adam L Sharp; Aniket A Kawatkar; Aileen S Baecker; Rita F Redberg; Ming-Sum Lee; Maros Ferencik; Yi-Lin Wu; Ernest Shen; Chengyi Zheng; Stacy Park; Steve Goodacre; Praveen Thokala; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Bariatric surgery and the risk of alcohol-related cirrhosis and alcohol misuse.

Authors:  Jessica L Mellinger; Kerby Shedden; G Scott Winder; Anne C Fernandez; Brian P Lee; Jennifer Waljee; Robert Fontana; Michael L Volk; Frederic C Blow; Anna S F Lok
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.828

7.  Evaluating Sex Disparities in the Emergency Department Management of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Salena M Preciado; Adam L Sharp; Benjamin C Sun; Aileen Baecker; Yi-Lin Wu; Ming-Sum Lee; Ernest Shen; Maros Ferencik; Shaw Natsui; Aniket A Kawatkar; Stacy J Park; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  The ethical dilemma of emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain.

Authors:  Nella W Hendley; John Moskop; Nicklaus P Ashburn; S A Mahler; Jason P Stopyra
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.814

9.  Major adverse cardiac event rates in moderate-risk patients: Does prior coronary disease matter?

Authors:  Henderson D McGinnis; Nicklaus P Ashburn; Brennan E Paradee; James C O'Neill; Anna C Snavely; Jason P Stopyra; Simon A Mahler
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.221

10.  High-Deductible Health Plans and Emergency Care for Chest Pain: To Go or Not to Go.

Authors:  Neil M Kalwani; Alexander T Sandhu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 39.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.