BACKGROUND: Management of acute myocardial infarction requires urgent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, which may not be uniformly available throughout the week. METHODS: We examined differences in mortality between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays for a first acute myocardial infarction, using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. All such admissions in New Jersey from 1987 to 2002 (231,164) were included and grouped in 4-year intervals. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, or infarction site between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays. However, patients admitted on weekends were less likely to undergo invasive cardiac procedures, especially on the first and second days of hospitalization (P<0.001). In the interval from 1999 to 2002 (59,786 admissions), mortality at 30 days was significantly higher for patients admitted on weekends (12.9% vs. 12.0%, P=0.006). The difference became significant the day after admission (3.3% vs. 2.7%, P<0.001) and persisted at 1 year (1% absolute difference in mortality). The difference in mortality at 30 days remained significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, and site of infarction (hazard ratio, 1.048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.022 to 1.076; P<0.001), but it became nonsignificant after additional adjustment for invasive cardiac procedures (hazard ratio, 1.023; 95% CI, 0.997 to 1.049; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with myocardial infarction, admission on weekends is associated with higher mortality and lower use of invasive cardiac procedures. Our findings suggest that the higher mortality on weekends is mediated in part by the lower rate of invasive procedures, and we speculate that better access to care on weekends could improve the outcome for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
BACKGROUND: Management of acute myocardial infarction requires urgent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, which may not be uniformly available throughout the week. METHODS: We examined differences in mortality between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays for a first acute myocardial infarction, using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System. All such admissions in New Jersey from 1987 to 2002 (231,164) were included and grouped in 4-year intervals. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, or infarction site between patients admitted on weekends and those admitted on weekdays. However, patients admitted on weekends were less likely to undergo invasive cardiac procedures, especially on the first and second days of hospitalization (P<0.001). In the interval from 1999 to 2002 (59,786 admissions), mortality at 30 days was significantly higher for patients admitted on weekends (12.9% vs. 12.0%, P=0.006). The difference became significant the day after admission (3.3% vs. 2.7%, P<0.001) and persisted at 1 year (1% absolute difference in mortality). The difference in mortality at 30 days remained significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics, coexisting conditions, and site of infarction (hazard ratio, 1.048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.022 to 1.076; P<0.001), but it became nonsignificant after additional adjustment for invasive cardiac procedures (hazard ratio, 1.023; 95% CI, 0.997 to 1.049; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with myocardial infarction, admission on weekends is associated with higher mortality and lower use of invasive cardiac procedures. Our findings suggest that the higher mortality on weekends is mediated in part by the lower rate of invasive procedures, and we speculate that better access to care on weekends could improve the outcome for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Authors: Matthew T James; Ron Wald; Chaim M Bell; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Sushrut S Waikar; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: N Freemantle; M Richardson; J Wood; D Ray; S Khosla; D Shahian; W R Roche; I Stephens; B Keogh; D Pagano Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: David W Johnson; Philip Clayton; Yeoungjee Cho; Sunil V Badve; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen McDonald; Neil Boudville; Kathryn J Wiggins; Kym Bannister; Fiona Brown Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: S Mijatovic; D Maksimovic-Ivanic; J Radovic; Dj Miljkovic; Lj Harhaji; O Vuckovic; S Stosic-Grujicic; M Mostarica Stojkovic; V Trajkovic Journal: Cell Mol Life Sci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.261
Authors: Luc Dubois; Kelly Vogt; Chris Vinden; Jennifer Winick-Ng; J Andrew McClure; Pavel S Roshanov; Chaim M Bell; Amit X Garg Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Mahdi Khoshchehreh; Elliott M Groves; David Tehrani; Alpesh Amin; Pranav M Patel; Shaista Malik Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.164