Literature DB >> 29374373

Utilization of stress testing for low-risk patients with chest discomfort in the emergency department.

Sheela Krishnan1, Rachael Venn2, Daniel M Blumenthal3, Vijeta Bhambhani3, Henry Gewirtz3, Rory B Weiner3, John T Nagurney4, Jason H Wasfy3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of patients presenting to an emergency department with chest discomfort at low-risk for acute coronary syndrome represents a common clinical challenge. Such patients are often triaged to chest pain units for monitoring and cardiac stress testing for further risk stratification.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 292 low-risk patients who presented to an emergency department with chest discomfort. We performed physician-adjudicated chart reviews of all patients with positive stress tests to assess downstream testing, subsequent coronary revascularization, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 292 patients, 33 (11.3%) had stress tests positive for ischemia, and 12 (4.1%) underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Of the 292 patients, 4 (1.4%) underwent coronary revascularization that may have resulted in a mortality benefit.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest a very low yield of detecting clinically significant coronary disease with stress testing low-risk patients with chest discomfort in emergency department chest pain units.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ischemia; diagnostic and prognostic application; exercise: stress testing; myocardial; myocardial perfusion imaging: SPECT; pharmacologic stress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29374373     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1172-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  8 in total

1.  ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Daniel S Berman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Paul A Heidenreich; Robert E Henkin; Patricia A Pellikka; Gerald M Pohost; Kim A Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Cardiac Testing After Emergency Department Evaluation for Chest Pain: Time for a Paradigm Shift?

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

Authors:  J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Stephan D Fihn; James C Blankenship; Karen P Alexander; John A Bittl; John G Byrne; Barbara J Fletcher; Gregg C Fonarow; Richard A Lange; Glenn N Levine; Thomas M Maddox; Srihari S Naidu; E Magnus Ohman; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Alexander T Sandhu; Paul A Heidenreich; Jay Bhattacharya; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 6.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Yield of routine provocative cardiac testing among patients in an emergency department-based chest pain unit.

Authors:  Luke K Hermann; David H Newman; W Andrew Pleasant; Dhanadol Rojanasarntikul; Daniel Lakoff; Scott A Goldberg; W Lane Duvall; Milena J Henzlova
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Effect of Using the HEART Score in Patients With Chest Pain in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Judith M Poldervaart; Johannes B Reitsma; Barbra E Backus; Hendrik Koffijberg; Rolf F Veldkamp; Monique E Ten Haaf; Yolande Appelman; Herman F J Mannaerts; Jan-Melle van Dantzig; Madelon van den Heuvel; Mohamed El Farissi; Bernard J W M Rensing; Nicolette M S K J Ernst; Ineke M C Dekker; Frank R den Hartog; Thomas Oosterhof; Ghizelda R Lagerweij; Eugene M Buijs; Maarten W J van Hessen; Marcel A J Landman; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Luc Cozijnsen; Jeroen J J Bucx; Clara E E van Ofwegen-Hanekamp; Maarten-Jan Cramer; A Jacob Six; Pieter A Doevendans; Arno W Hoes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Provocative testing for low-risk chest pain patients, must we continue?

Authors:  James Booth; J Jeremy Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.952

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.