Literature DB >> 12898483

Impact of stress testing on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes for low-risk patients with chest pain admitted to floor telemetry beds.

Grace Wu Chan1, Frank D Sites, Frances S Shofer, Judd E Hollander.   

Abstract

The role of immediate stress testing in low-risk patients with a potential acute coronary syndrome has not been rigorously evaluated with respect to impact on 30-day cardiovascular events. We evaluated the impact of inpatient, outpatient, or no stress testing (ETT) on 30-day cardiovascular outcomes. We performed a prospective cohort study in which consecutive patients with chest pain were admitted to a non-intensive-care telemetry bed over 16 months. Patients were identified in the ED, followed daily through hospitalization, and contacted by telephone at 30 days. Patients were excluded if they were admitted to the coronary care unit, died during hospitalization, sustained an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), or received cardiac catheterization before ETT. Patients were stratified according to whether they received an ETT as an inpatient, outpatient, or no ETT. Main outcomes were 30-day cardiac death, AMI, percutaneous interventions (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Data are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for main outcomes. A total of 832 patients were admitted 962 times. A total of 205 patients (21%) received an in-house ETT. Seventy-four patients (10%) without an inpatient ETT received an outpatient ETT. At baseline, the groups were similar with respect to likelihood of ischemia based on mean ACI-TIPI score and Goldman risk score. A total of 98% of patients had 30-day follow-up. The cardiovascular outcomes (with 95% confidence interval) for patients with inpatient ETT versus outpatient ETT versus no ETT were as follows: death, 0% (0-1.5%) vs 0% (0-4.1%) vs 1% (0.3-1.7%); AMI, 1% (0.1-2.4%) vs 1.4% (0.1-4.1%) vs 0.3% (0.1-0.7%); PCI, 0.5% (0.1-1.5%) vs 1.3% (0.1-4.1%) vs 0% (0-0.4%); and CABG, 0.5% (0.1-1.5%) vs 0% (0-4.1%) vs 0.2% (0.1-0.4%). There was no statistical difference in 30-day cardiovascular outcomes among patients who received inpatient, outpatient, or no ETT within 30 days. This suggests that patients with chest pain who are admitted to non-intensive-care telemetry (or observation unit) beds might not need stress testing before hospital release.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898483     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(03)00080-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  7 in total

1.  Cost burden of non-specific chest pain admissions.

Authors:  J Groarke; J O'Brien; G Go; M Susanto; P Owens; A O Maree
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events?

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Brian C Hiestand; David C Goff; James W Hoekstra; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2011-09

3.  Comparative effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies in emergency department patients with chest pain: an analysis of downstream testing, interventions, and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew J Foy; Guodong Liu; William R Davidson; Christopher Sciamanna; Douglas L Leslie
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Cardiovascular Testing and Clinical Outcomes in Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain.

Authors:  Alexander T Sandhu; Paul A Heidenreich; Jay Bhattacharya; M Kate Bundorf
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Management strategies for patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Joshua M Kosowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-02

6.  Exploitation of resources and cardiovascular outcomes in low-risk patients with chest pain hospitalized in coronary care units.

Authors:  Habibollah Saadat; Hossein Shiri; Zahra Salarpour; Tahereh Ashktorab; Hamid Alavi Majd; Zahra Saadat; Hosein Vakili
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-10-19

7.  Risk stratification and role for additional diagnostic testing in patients with acute chest pain and normal high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels.

Authors:  Martijn W Smulders; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Yvonne J M van Cauteren; Anna Liefhebber; Jasper R Vermeer; Juliette Vervuurt; Marja P van Dieijen-Visser; Alma M A Mingels; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Pieter C Dagnelie; Joachim E Wildberger; Harry J G M Crijns; Bas L J H Kietselaer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.