BACKGROUND: The cephalic index is often used to evaluate sagittal craniosynostosis corrections; however, validation of this measure remains untested. METHODS: A three-part study was designed to (1) determine the normal distribution of cephalic indices in untreated sagittal craniosynostosis; (2) examine index values in treated children, subsequently determined to require secondary surgery; and (3) explore the correlation between a photography-based assessment of scaphocephaly severity and the cephalic index. RESULTS: Of 392 preoperatively measured patients (mean cephalic index, 70.7; 95 percent CI, 57.4 to 89.5), 343 (87.5 percent) had Z scores falling within 2 SD of the mean; only 49 (12.5 percent) fell more than 2 SD below the mean, whereas 13 percent exceeded the mean. For 10 patients requiring secondary surgery (mean cephalic index, 74.8; 95 percent CI, 68.1 to 83.4), the mean Z score was -0.5 (range, -2.5 to 1.6). The polled results of 10 observers revealed no significant correlation between subjectively ranked severity scores and cephalic indices. CONCLUSIONS: Although the average preoperative cephalic index in children with sagittal craniosynostosis was below normal, the majority of measurements fell within a statistically normal distribution. Furthermore, many children requiring secondary corrections were found to have relatively normal indices, suggesting that normal values are not necessarily predictive of satisfactory outcomes. We also found no correlation between this index and a subjective assessment of severity. These findings suggest that the cephalic index is not a reliable outcome measure, perhaps because of the inability for this ratio to capture the amount of correction of the reduced posterior skull height associated with sagittal craniosynostosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.
BACKGROUND: The cephalic index is often used to evaluate sagittal craniosynostosis corrections; however, validation of this measure remains untested. METHODS: A three-part study was designed to (1) determine the normal distribution of cephalic indices in untreated sagittal craniosynostosis; (2) examine index values in treated children, subsequently determined to require secondary surgery; and (3) explore the correlation between a photography-based assessment of scaphocephaly severity and the cephalic index. RESULTS: Of 392 preoperatively measured patients (mean cephalic index, 70.7; 95 percent CI, 57.4 to 89.5), 343 (87.5 percent) had Z scores falling within 2 SD of the mean; only 49 (12.5 percent) fell more than 2 SD below the mean, whereas 13 percent exceeded the mean. For 10 patients requiring secondary surgery (mean cephalic index, 74.8; 95 percent CI, 68.1 to 83.4), the mean Z score was -0.5 (range, -2.5 to 1.6). The polled results of 10 observers revealed no significant correlation between subjectively ranked severity scores and cephalic indices. CONCLUSIONS: Although the average preoperative cephalic index in children with sagittal craniosynostosis was below normal, the majority of measurements fell within a statistically normal distribution. Furthermore, many children requiring secondary corrections were found to have relatively normal indices, suggesting that normal values are not necessarily predictive of satisfactory outcomes. We also found no correlation between this index and a subjective assessment of severity. These findings suggest that the cephalic index is not a reliable outcome measure, perhaps because of the inability for this ratio to capture the amount of correction of the reduced posterior skull height associated with sagittal craniosynostosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, IV.
Authors: Antonio R Porras; Liyun Tu; Deki Tsering; Esperanza Mantilla; Albert Oh; Andinet Enquobahrie; Robert Keating; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Jessica D Blum; Daniel Y Cho; Liana Cheung; Dillan F Villavisanis; Jinggang Ng; Jordan W Swanson; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 1.532
Authors: Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas; Liyun Tu; Agnes Goldrich; Monica Manrique; Antonio R Porras; Robert F Keating; Albert K Oh; Marius George Linguraru; Gary F Rogers Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2020 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Christopher D Hughes; Olivia Langa; Laura Nuzzi; Steven J Staffa; Mark Proctor; John G Meara; Ingrid M Ganske Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-05-21
Authors: Christopher D Hughes; Kathryn V Isaac; Paul F Hwang; Ingrid Ganske; Mark R Proctor; John G Meara Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2018-07-09
Authors: Alexandra Junn; Jacob Dinis; Kitae E Park; Sacha Hauc; Jenny F Yang; Carolyn Chuang; Gloria Han; James C McPartland; John A Persing; Michael Alperovich Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-10-04
Authors: Jiawei Liu; Connor Elkhill; Scott LeBeau; Brooke French; Natasha Lepore; Marius George Linguraru; Antonio R Porras Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2022-08-10