Literature DB >> 32282689

Occult Scaphocephaly: A Forme Fruste Phenotype of Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas1, Liyun Tu2, Agnes Goldrich1, Monica Manrique1, Antonio R Porras2, Robert F Keating3, Albert K Oh1, Marius George Linguraru2, Gary F Rogers1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Latent cranial suture fusions may present with mild or absent phenotypic changes that make the clinical diagnosis challenging. Recent reports describe patients with sagittal synostosis and a normal cranial index (CI), a condition termed normocephalic sagittal craniosynostosis (NSC). The goal of this study is to evaluate the shape and intracranial volume (ICV) in a cohort of NSC patients using quantitative cranial shape analysis (CSA).
METHODS: We identified 19 patients (7.5 ± 2.28 years) between 2011 and 2016, who presented to our hospital with NSC. Cranial index and CSA were measured from the computed tomography image. Cranial shape analysis calculates the distances between the patient's cranial shape and its closest normal shape. Intracranial volume was measured and compared to an established age-matched normative database.
RESULTS: Cranial index revealed 15 (78.9%) patients within the mesocephalic range and 4 patients (21.1%) in the brachycephalic range. Detailed CSA identified 15 (78.9%) patients with subtle phenotypic changes along the scaphocephalic spectrum (ie, subtle anterior and posterior elongation with inter-parietal narrowing) and 1 patient (5.3%) with isolated overdevelopment on the posterior part of the right parietal bone. Three patients (15.8%) had a CSA close to normal. Mean ICV was 1410.5 ± 192.77cc; most patients (78.9%) fell within ±2 standard deviations.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative CSA revealed that most of the patients with NSC had cranial shape abnormalities, consistent with a forme fruste scaphocephaly that could not be otherwise recognized by clinical observation or CI. Given these findings, we propose the term occult scaphocephaly to describe this condition. The associated incidence of intracranial hypertension is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32282689      PMCID: PMC7343588          DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  37 in total

1.  Intracranial volume in patients with nonsyndromal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David John Netherway; Amanda Helen Abbott; Peter John Anderson; David John David
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Treatment for delayed presentation of sagittal synostosis: challenges pertaining to occult intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Albert K Oh; Michael J Boyajian; Jeffrey C Posnick; Robert F Keating
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Intracranial compartment volume changes in sagittal craniosynostosis patients: influence of comprehensive cranioplasty.

Authors:  Su-Shin Lee; Charles C Duncan; Bianca I Knoll; John A Persing
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Sagittal synostosis: I. Preoperative morphology of the skull.

Authors:  José Guimarães-Ferreira; Fredrik Gewalli; Lisa David; Tron A Darvann; Nuno V Hermann; Sven Kreiborg; Hans Friede; Claes G K Lauritzen
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2006

5.  Personalized assessment of craniosynostosis via statistical shape modeling.

Authors:  Carlos S Mendoza; Nabile Safdar; Kazunori Okada; Emmarie Myers; Gary F Rogers; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Intracranial volume (ICV) in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis: a retrospective case-matched-control study.

Authors:  James Holland; Desideiro Rodrigues; Shyam Mohan; Nicholas White
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Comparison of Traditional versus Normative Cephalic Index in Patients with Sagittal Synostosis: Measure of Scaphocephaly and Postoperative Outcome.

Authors:  Lucas A Dvoracek; Gary B Skolnick; Dennis C Nguyen; Sybill D Naidoo; Matthew D Smyth; Albert S Woo; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Single-suture craniosynostosis: a review of neurobehavioral research and theory.

Authors:  Matthew L Speltz; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Michael Cunningham; Jeffrey Marsh; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2004-12

9.  Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis.

Authors:  D Renier; C Sainte-Rose; D Marchac; J F Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Intracranial pressure and intracranial volume in children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  D T Gault; D Renier; D Marchac; B M Jones
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  1 in total

1.  Making the Diagnosis in Sagittal Craniosynostosis-It's Height, Not Length, That Matters.

Authors:  Jessica D Blum; Daniel Y Cho; Liana Cheung; Dillan F Villavisanis; Jinggang Ng; Jordan W Swanson; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.