Literature DB >> 34036018

Evaluating Surgical Decision-making in Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using a Digital 3D Model.

Christopher D Hughes1, Olivia Langa2, Laura Nuzzi2, Steven J Staffa3, Mark Proctor2, John G Meara2, Ingrid M Ganske2.   

Abstract

Surgical correction of craniosynostosis addresses potentially elevated intracranial pressure and the cranial deformity. In nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis, approximately 15% of patients have elevated intracranial pressure. The decision to operate therefore likely reflects a combination of aesthetic goals, prevention of brain growth restriction over time, surgeon training and experience, and parental expectations. This study examines clinical factors that influence surgical decision-making in nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis.
METHODS: An online survey sent to craniofacial and neurosurgeons presented 5 theoretical patients with varying severities of sagittal synostosis. For each cephalic index, 4 separate clinical scenarios were presented to assess influences of parental concern and developmental delay on the decision to operate.
RESULTS: Fifty-six surveys were completed (response rate = 28%). Participants were predominantly from North America (57%), had over 10 years of experience (75%), and performed over 20 craniosynostosis procedures annually (50%). Thirty percent of respondents indicated they would operate regardless of head shape and without clinical and/or parental concern. Head shape was the greatest predictor of decision to operate (P < 0.001). Parental concern and developmental delay were independently associated with decision to operate (P < 0.001). Surgeons with more experience were also more likely to operate across all phenotypes (OR: 2.69, P < 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons responding to this survey were more strongly compelled to operate on children with nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis when head shape was more severe. Additional factors, including parental concern and developmental delay, also influence the decision to operate, especially for moderate phenotypes. Geographic and subspecialty variations were not significant.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34036018      PMCID: PMC8140767          DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open        ISSN: 2169-7574


  32 in total

1.  Multicenter study of neurodevelopment in 3-year-old children with and without single-suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Starr; Brent R Collett; Rebecca Gaither; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Mary Michaeleen Cradock; Michael L Cunningham; Matthew L Speltz
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2012-06-01

2.  Intellectual outcomes in children and adolescents with syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Annette C Da Costa; Izabela Walters; Ravi Savarirayan; Vicki A Anderson; Jacquie A Wrennall; John G Meara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Quantitative morphometric outcomes following the Melbourne method of total vault remodeling for scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Robert Toma; Andrew L Greensmith; John G Meara; Annette C Da Costa; Lloyd A Ellis; Susanne K Willams; Anthony D Holmes
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Neurodevelopment of children with single suture craniosynostosis: a review.

Authors:  Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Matthew L Speltz; Michael L Cunningham; Pravin K Patel; Tadanori Tomita
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Sagittal craniosynostosis: a utility outcomes study.

Authors:  Victoria Kuta; P Daniel McNeely; Simon Walling; Michael Bezuhly
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Tracing craniosynostosis to its developmental stage through bone center displacement.

Authors:  I M Mathijssen; J van Splunder; C Vermeij-Keers; H Pieterman; T H de Jong; M P Mooney; J M Vaandrager
Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Single-suture craniosynostosis: a review of neurobehavioral research and theory.

Authors:  Matthew L Speltz; Kathleen A Kapp-Simon; Michael Cunningham; Jeffrey Marsh; Geraldine Dawson
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2004-12

Review 8.  Operative Management of Nonsyndromic Sagittal Synostosis: A Head-to-Head Meta-analysis of Outcomes Comparing 3 Techniques.

Authors:  Patrick A Gerety; Marten N Basta; John P Fischer; Jesse A Taylor
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 9.  Neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants and children with single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah J Knight; Vicki A Anderson; Megan M Spencer-Smith; Annette C Da Costa
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Modification of the Melbourne Method for Total Calvarial Vault Remodeling.

Authors:  Christopher D Hughes; Kathryn V Isaac; Paul F Hwang; Ingrid Ganske; Mark R Proctor; John G Meara
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.