Literature DB >> 35438317

Making the Diagnosis in Sagittal Craniosynostosis-It's Height, Not Length, That Matters.

Jessica D Blum1, Daniel Y Cho1, Liana Cheung1, Dillan F Villavisanis1, Jinggang Ng1, Jordan W Swanson1, Scott P Bartlett1, Jesse A Taylor2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the diagnostic reliability of a novel photogrammetric measurement to distinguish sagittal craniosynostosis (SS) from control and false positive cases (SNS).
METHODS: Head CTs from 2014-2020 were reviewed for patients with sagittal synostosis (SS, n = 177), presumed sagittal synostosis with normal imaging (SNS, n = 30), and controls (n = 100). Using preoperative clinical photographs and CTs, a measurement reflecting the anterior-posterior location of the vertex was measured using an angle drawn between the cranial vertex, nasion, and opisthocranion (VNO) in profile view, with the head in a neutral position.
RESULTS: Mean age at pre-operative head CT was 9.5 months for the SS cohort, 4.2 months for the SNS cohort, and 8.9 months for controls (p = .327). Mean age at pre-operative clinical photograph was 9.5 months for the SS cohort and 4.2 months for the SNS cohort (p = .149). Pearson correlations revealed no significant association between age and VNO angle. The average VNO angle measured on clinical photographs was 54.7° ± 3.8° for the SS group, 43.1° ± 2.2° for the SNS group, and 41.1° ± 3.7° for controls (p < .001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded a cut-off of ≥ 50° to identify SS. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 96.6% and 99.2%, respectively. Three-rater analysis yielded an average ICC of 0.742 (p = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the VNO angle is a reliable screening tool to diagnose sagittal craniosynostosis, with an angle of 50° or more suggesting suture synostosis. This method relies on the relationship between the anterior displacement of the vertex and occipital bulleting to approach the diagnostic accuracy of CT imaging.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniosynostosis; Diagnosis; Diagnostics; Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35438317     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-022-05518-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.532


  12 in total

1.  Intracranial volume is normal in infants with sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Sara Fischer; Giovanni Maltese; Peter Tarnow; Emma Wikberg; Peter Bernhardt; Robert Tovetjärn; Lars Kölby
Journal:  J Plast Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2014-11-03

2.  Virchow and the pathogenesis of craniosynostosis: a translation of his original work.

Authors:  J A Persing; J A Jane; M Shaffrey
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  An epidemiological study of nonsyndromal craniosynostoses.

Authors:  John C Kolar
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  The relationship between scaphocephaly at the skull vault and skull base in sagittal synostosis.

Authors:  Charlotte L Bendon; Fintan B J Sheerin; Steven A Wall; David Johnson
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Sagittal suture craniosynostosis or craniosynostoses? The heterogeneity of the most common premature fusion of the cranial sutures.

Authors:  F Di Rocco; A Gleizal; A Szathmari; P A Beuriat; C Paulus; C Mottolese
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.553

6.  New insights into the relationship between suture closure and craniofacial dysmorphology in sagittal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Yann Heuzé; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Jeffrey L Marsh; Alex A Kane; Elijah Cherkez; James E Boggan; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Preoperative craniofacial dysmorphology in isolated sagittal synostosis: a comprehensive anthropometric evaluation.

Authors:  John C Kolar; Elizabeth M Salter; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Occult Scaphocephaly: A Forme Fruste Phenotype of Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas; Liyun Tu; Agnes Goldrich; Monica Manrique; Antonio R Porras; Robert F Keating; Albert K Oh; Marius George Linguraru; Gary F Rogers
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  The diagnosis and treatment of single-sutural synostoses: are computed tomographic scans necessary?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Fearon; Davinder J Singh; Stephen P Beals; Jack C Yu
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Familial incidence and associated symptoms in a population of individuals with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Jaclyn Greenwood; Pamela Flodman; Kathryn Osann; Simeon A Boyadjiev; Virginia Kimonis
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.