Literature DB >> 28649162

Scatter estimation and removal of anti-scatter grid-line artifacts from anthropomorphic head phantom images taken with a high resolution image detector.

R Rana1, A Jain1, A Shankar1, D R Bednarek1, S Rudin1.   

Abstract

In radiography, one of the best methods to eliminate image-degrading scatter radiation is the use of anti-scatter grids. However, with high-resolution dynamic imaging detectors, stationary anti-scatter grids can leave grid-line shadows and moiré patterns on the image, depending upon the line density of the grid and the sampling frequency of the x-ray detector. Such artifacts degrade the image quality and may mask small but important details such as small vessels and interventional device features. Appearance of these artifacts becomes increasingly severe as the detector spatial resolution is improved. We have previously demonstrated that, to remove these artifacts by dividing out a reference grid image, one must first subtract the residual scatter that penetrates the grid; however, for objects with anatomic structure, scatter varies throughout the FOV and a spatially differing amount of scatter must be subtracted. In this study, a standard stationary Smit-Rontgen X-ray grid (line density - 70 lines/cm, grid ratio - 13:1) was used with a high-resolution CMOS detector, the Dexela 1207 (pixel size - 75 micron) to image anthropomorphic head phantoms. For a 15 × 15cm FOV, scatter profiles of the anthropomorphic head phantoms were estimated then iteratively modified to minimize the structured noise due to the varying grid-line artifacts across the FOV. Images of the anthropomorphic head phantoms taken with the grid, before and after the corrections, were compared demonstrating almost total elimination of the artifact over the full FOV. Hence, with proper computational tools, anti-scatter grid artifacts can be corrected, even during dynamic sequences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMOS detector; anthropomorphic head phantom; anti-scatter grid; grid artifacts; high resolution detector; iterative artifact removal; scatter estimation; x-ray imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 28649162      PMCID: PMC5482265          DOI: 10.1117/12.2216833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Contrast and scatter in x-ray imaging.

Authors:  G T Barnes
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: a model calculation.

Authors:  U Neitzel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Grid line artifact formation: A comprehensive theory.

Authors:  David M Gauntt; Gary T Barnes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Artifacts produced by moving grids.

Authors:  D R Bednarek; S Rudin; R Wong
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Anti-scatter grid artifact elimination for high resolution x-ray imaging CMOS detectors.

Authors:  R Rana; V Singh; A Jain; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-18

6.  Endovascular image-guided interventions (EIGIs).

Authors:  Stephen Rudin; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Limitations of anti-scatter grids when used with high resolution image detectors.

Authors:  V Singh; A Jain; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-19
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Simultaneous scatter rejection and correction method using 2D antiscatter grids for CBCT.

Authors:  Zhelin Yu; Yeonok Park; Cem Altunbas
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-16

2.  Anti-scatter grid artifact elimination for high-resolution x-ray imaging detectors without a prior scatter distribution profile.

Authors:  S V Setlur Nagesh; R Rana; D R Bednarek; S Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-09

3.  A unified scatter rejection and correction method for cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Cem Altunbas; Yeonok Park; Zhelin Yu; Anant Gopal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.