Literature DB >> 28645379

DNA Fiber Analysis: Mind the Gap!

Annabel Quinet1, Denisse Carvajal-Maldonado1, Delphine Lemacon1, Alessandro Vindigni2.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of replication stress response following genotoxic stress induction is rapidly emerging as a central theme in cell survival and human disease. The DNA fiber assay is one of the most powerful tools to study alterations in replication fork dynamics genome-wide at single-molecule resolution. This approach relies on the ability of many organisms to incorporate thymidine analogs into replicating DNA and is widely used to study how genotoxic agents perturb DNA replication. Here, we review different approaches available to prepare DNA fibers and discuss important limitations of each approach. We also review how DNA fiber analysis can be used to shed light upon several replication parameters including fork progression, restart, termination, and new origin firing. Next, we discuss a modified DNA fiber protocol to monitor the presence of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps on ongoing replication forks. ssDNA gaps are very common intermediates of several replication stress response mechanisms, but they cannot be detected by standard DNA fiber approaches due to the resolution limits of this technique. We discuss a novel strategy that relies on the use of an ssDNA-specific endonuclease to nick the ssDNA gaps and generate shorter DNA fibers that can be used as readout for the presence of ssDNA gaps. Finally, we describe a follow-up DNA fiber approach that can be used to study how ssDNA gaps are repaired postreplicatively.
© 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA fiber analysis; DNA replication; Postreplication repair; Replication stress; S1 nuclease; Single-stranded DNA gap

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28645379     DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  58 in total

1.  USP1 Is Required for Replication Fork Protection in BRCA1-Deficient Tumors.

Authors:  Kah Suan Lim; Heng Li; Emma A Roberts; Emily F Gaudiano; Connor Clairmont; Larissa Alina Sambel; Karthikeyan Ponnienselvan; Jessica C Liu; Chunyu Yang; David Kozono; Kalindi Parmar; Timur Yusufzai; Ning Zheng; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  CARM1 regulates replication fork speed and stress response by stimulating PARP1.

Authors:  Marie-Michelle Genois; Jean-Philippe Gagné; Takaaki Yasuhara; Jessica Jackson; Sneha Saxena; Marie-France Langelier; Ivan Ahel; Mark T Bedford; John M Pascal; Alessandro Vindigni; Guy G Poirier; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis.

Authors:  Gongshi Bai; Chames Kermi; Henriette Stoy; Carl J Schiltz; Julien Bacal; Angela M Zaino; M Kyle Hadden; Brandt F Eichman; Massimo Lopes; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Biomarker-Guided Development of DNA Repair Inhibitors.

Authors:  James M Cleary; Andrew J Aguirre; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Ca2+-Stimulated AMPK-Dependent Phosphorylation of Exo1 Protects Stressed Replication Forks from Aberrant Resection.

Authors:  Shan Li; Zeno Lavagnino; Delphine Lemacon; Lingzhen Kong; Alessandro Ustione; Xuewen Ng; Yuanya Zhang; Yingchun Wang; Bin Zheng; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Alessandro Vindigni; David W Piston; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Hair follicle stem cell replication stress drives IFI16/STING-dependent inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa.

Authors:  Cindy Orvain; Yea-Lih Lin; Francette Jean-Louis; Hakim Hocini; Barbara Hersant; Yamina Bennasser; Nicolas Ortonne; Claire Hotz; Pierre Wolkenstein; Michele Boniotto; Pascaline Tisserand; Cécile Lefebvre; Jean-Daniel Lelièvre; Monsef Benkirane; Philippe Pasero; Yves Lévy; Sophie Hüe
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  PCAF-Mediated Histone Acetylation Promotes Replication Fork Degradation by MRE11 and EXO1 in BRCA-Deficient Cells.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Ji-Hye Choi; Hyun Goo Woo; Blerta Xhemalce; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Translation of DNA Damage Response Inhibitors as Chemoradiation Sensitizers From the Laboratory to the Clinic.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Qiang Zhang; David Karnak; Joshua D Parsels; Kwok Lam; Henning Willers; Michael D Green; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Human CST complex protects stalled replication forks by directly blocking MRE11 degradation of nascent-strand DNA.

Authors:  Xinxing Lyu; Kai-Hang Lei; Pau Biak Sang; Olga Shiva; Megan Chastain; Peter Chi; Weihang Chai
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Nonsense-Mediated RNA Decay Is a Unique Vulnerability of Cancer Cells Harboring SF3B1 or U2AF1 Mutations.

Authors:  Abigael Cheruiyot; Shan Li; Sridhar Nonavinkere Srivatsan; Tanzir Ahmed; Yuhao Chen; Delphine S Lemacon; Ying Li; Zheng Yang; Brian A Wadugu; Wayne A Warner; Shondra M Pruett-Miller; Esther A Obeng; Daniel C Link; Dalin He; Fei Xiao; Xiaowei Wang; Julie M Bailis; Matthew J Walter; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.