Literature DB >> 34348175

Translation of DNA Damage Response Inhibitors as Chemoradiation Sensitizers From the Laboratory to the Clinic.

Leslie A Parsels1, Qiang Zhang1, David Karnak1, Joshua D Parsels1, Kwok Lam1, Henning Willers2, Michael D Green1, Alnawaz Rehemtulla1, Theodore S Lawrence1, Meredith A Morgan3.   

Abstract

Combination therapies with agents targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) offer an opportunity to selectively enhance the therapeutic index of chemoradiation or eliminate use of chemotherapy altogether. The successful translation of DDR inhibitors to clinical use requires investigating both their direct actions as (chemo)radiosensitizers and their potential to stimulate tumor immunogenicity. Beginning with high-throughput screening using both viability and DNA damage-reporter assays, followed by validation in gold-standard radiation colony-forming assays and in vitro assessment of mechanistic effects on the DDR, we describe proven strategies and methods leading to the clinical development of DDR inhibitors both with radiation alone and in combination with chemoradiation. Beyond these in vitro studies, we discuss the impact of key features of human xenograft and syngeneic mouse models on the relevance of in vivo tumor efficacy studies, particularly with regard to the immunogenic effects of combined therapy with radiation and DDR inhibitors. Finally, we describe recent technological advances in radiation delivery (using the small animal radiation research platform) that allow for conformal, clinically relevant radiation therapy in mouse models. This overall approach is critical to the successful clinical development and ultimate Food and Drug Administration approval of DDR inhibitors as (chemo)radiation sensitizers.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34348175      PMCID: PMC8602768          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  122 in total

Review 1.  Patient-Derived Xenografts as a Model System for Radiation Research.

Authors:  Christopher D Willey; Ashley N Gilbert; Joshua C Anderson; George Yancey Gillespie
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Pavel Moudry; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; MyungHee Lee; Robert Strauss; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Daria M Tanska; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Replication dynamics: biases and robustness of DNA fiber analysis.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Dana Azar; Therese Wilhelm; Sandra Carignon; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse; Benoît Le Tallec
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Localized CT-guided irradiation inhibits neurogenesis in specific regions of the adult mouse brain.

Authors:  E C Ford; P Achanta; D Purger; M Armour; J Reyes; J Fong; L Kleinberg; K Redmond; J Wong; M H Jang; H Jun; H-J Song; A Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  A minority of foci or pan-nuclear apoptotic staining of gammaH2AX in the S phase after UV damage contain DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sebastien de Feraudy; Ingrid Revet; Vladimir Bezrookove; Luzviminda Feeney; James E Cleaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  ATR inhibition preferentially targets homologous recombination-deficient tumor cells.

Authors:  M Krajewska; R S N Fehrmann; P M Schoonen; S Labib; E G E de Vries; L Franke; M A T M van Vugt
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Radiation-Induced Chromosomal Aberrations and Immunotherapy: Micronuclei, Cytosolic DNA, and Interferon-Production Pathway.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Clinical Candidates Targeting the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 Axis in Cancer.

Authors:  Lukas Gorecki; Martin Andrs; Jan Korabecny
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Purine metabolism regulates DNA repair and therapy resistance in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Weihua Zhou; Yangyang Yao; Andrew J Scott; Kari Wilder-Romans; Joseph J Dresser; Christian K Werner; Hanshi Sun; Drew Pratt; Peter Sajjakulnukit; Shuang G Zhao; Mary Davis; Barbara S Nelson; Christopher J Halbrook; Li Zhang; Francesco Gatto; Yoshie Umemura; Angela K Walker; Maureen Kachman; Jann N Sarkaria; Jianping Xiong; Meredith A Morgan; Alnawaz Rehemtualla; Maria G Castro; Pedro Lowenstein; Sriram Chandrasekaran; Theodore S Lawrence; Costas A Lyssiotis; Daniel R Wahl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tumor Heterogeneity Research and Innovation in Biologically Based Radiation Therapy From the National Cancer Institute Radiation Research Program Portfolio.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Michael G Espey; Ceferino Obcemea; Jacek Capala; Mansoor Ahmed; Pataje G Prasanna; Bhadrasain Vikram; Julie A Hong; Beverly Teicher; Molykutty J Aryankalayil; Michelle A Bylicky; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 2.  Contribution of Lipid Oxidation and Ferroptosis to Radiotherapy Efficacy.

Authors:  Ashley N Pearson; Joseph Carmicheal; Long Jiang; Yu Leo Lei; Michael D Green
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.