Literature DB >> 33412112

CARM1 regulates replication fork speed and stress response by stimulating PARP1.

Marie-Michelle Genois1, Jean-Philippe Gagné2, Takaaki Yasuhara1, Jessica Jackson3, Sneha Saxena1, Marie-France Langelier4, Ivan Ahel5, Mark T Bedford6, John M Pascal4, Alessandro Vindigni3, Guy G Poirier2, Lee Zou7.   

Abstract

DNA replication forks use multiple mechanisms to deal with replication stress, but how the choice of mechanisms is made is still poorly understood. Here, we show that CARM1 associates with replication forks and reduces fork speed independently of its methyltransferase activity. The speeding of replication forks in CARM1-deficient cells requires RECQ1, which resolves reversed forks, and RAD18, which promotes translesion synthesis. Loss of CARM1 reduces fork reversal and increases single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps but allows cells to tolerate higher replication stress. Mechanistically, CARM1 interacts with PARP1 and promotes PARylation at replication forks. In vitro, CARM1 stimulates PARP1 activity by enhancing its DNA binding and acts jointly with HPF1 to activate PARP1. Thus, by stimulating PARP1, CARM1 slows replication forks and promotes the use of fork reversal in the stress response, revealing that CARM1 and PARP1 function as a regulatory module at forks to control fork speed and the choice of stress response mechanisms.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CARM1; PARP1; PARylation; PrimPol; RECQ1; fork reversal; fork speed; replication fork; replication stress; translesion synthesis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33412112      PMCID: PMC7897296          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  68 in total

1.  Topoisomerase I poisoning results in PARP-mediated replication fork reversal.

Authors:  Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Yoshitami Hashimoto; Raquel Herrador; Kai J Neelsen; Daniele Fachinetti; Rodrigo Bermejo; Andrea Cocito; Vincenzo Costanzo; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  PRP19 transforms into a sensor of RPA-ssDNA after DNA damage and drives ATR activation via a ubiquitin-mediated circuitry.

Authors:  Ju-Mei Li; Xiao Ye Ji; Alexandre Maréchal; Ching-Shyi Wu; Stephanie A Yazinski; Hai Dang Nguyen; Shizhou Liu; Amanda E Jiménez; Jianping Jin; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Systems-wide Analysis of Serine ADP-Ribosylation Reveals Widespread Occurrence and Site-Specific Overlap with Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Sara C Larsen; Ivo A Hendriks; David Lyon; Lars J Jensen; Michael L Nielsen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Kristen L Meerbrey; Guang Hu; Jessica D Kessler; Kevin Roarty; Mamie Z Li; Justin E Fang; Jason I Herschkowitz; Anna E Burrows; Alberto Ciccia; Tingting Sun; Earlene M Schmitt; Ronald J Bernardi; Xiaoyong Fu; Christopher S Bland; Thomas A Cooper; Rachel Schiff; Jeffrey M Rosen; Thomas F Westbrook; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Replication fork slowing and stalling are distinct, checkpoint-independent consequences of replicating damaged DNA.

Authors:  Divya Ramalingam Iyer; Nicholas Rhind
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Restoration of Replication Fork Stability in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells by Inactivation of SNF2-Family Fork Remodelers.

Authors:  Angelo Taglialatela; Silvia Alvarez; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Vincenzo Sannino; Lepakshi Ranjha; Jen-Wei Huang; Chioma Madubata; Roopesh Anand; Brynn Levy; Raul Rabadan; Petr Cejka; Vincenzo Costanzo; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

8.  Human RECQ1 promotes restart of replication forks reversed by DNA topoisomerase I inhibition.

Authors:  Matteo Berti; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Saravanabhavan Thangavel; Shivasankari Gomathinayagam; Sasa Kenig; Marko Vujanovic; Federico Odreman; Timo Glatter; Simona Graziano; Ramiro Mendoza-Maldonado; Francesca Marino; Bojana Lucic; Valentina Biasin; Matthias Gstaiger; Ruedi Aebersold; Julia M Sidorova; Raymond J Monnat; Massimo Lopes; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Marco Y Hein; Christian A Luber; Igor Paron; Nagarjuna Nagaraj; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.911

10.  Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity.

Authors:  Marko Vujanovic; Jana Krietsch; Maria Chiara Raso; Nastassja Terraneo; Ralph Zellweger; Jonas A Schmid; Angelo Taglialatela; Jen-Wei Huang; Cory L Holland; Katharina Zwicky; Raquel Herrador; Heinz Jacobs; David Cortez; Alberto Ciccia; Lorenza Penengo; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  16 in total

1.  Single Molecular Resolution to Monitor DNA Replication Fork Dynamics upon Stress by DNA Fiber Assay.

Authors:  Wenpeng Liu
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Replication-dependent cytotoxicity and Spartan-mediated repair of trapped PARP1-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Liton Kumar Saha; Yasuhisa Murai; Sourav Saha; Ukhyun Jo; Masataka Tsuda; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Cellular pathways influenced by protein arginine methylation: Implications for cancer.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Stéphane Richard
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Hallmarks of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Sneha Saxena; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 19.328

5.  Temporally distinct post-replicative repair mechanisms fill PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps in human cells.

Authors:  Stephanie Tirman; Annabel Quinet; Matthew Wood; Alice Meroni; Emily Cybulla; Jessica Jackson; Silvia Pegoraro; Antoine Simoneau; Lee Zou; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 6.  Rapid Detection and Signaling of DNA Damage by PARP-1.

Authors:  Nootan Pandey; Ben E Black
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.264

Review 7.  The expanding universe of PARP1-mediated molecular and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Dan Huang; W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 8.  Translesion Synthesis or Repair by Specialized DNA Polymerases Limits Excessive Genomic Instability upon Replication Stress.

Authors:  Domenico Maiorano; Jana El Etri; Camille Franchet; Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Repriming DNA synthesis: an intrinsic restart pathway that maintains efficient genome replication.

Authors:  Lewis J Bainbridge; Rebecca Teague; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  CX-5461 Enhances the Efficacy of APR-246 via Induction of DNA Damage and Replication Stress in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ashwini Makhale; Devathri Nanayakkara; Prahlad Raninga; Kum Kum Khanna; Murugan Kalimutho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.