Literature DB >> 32442397

HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis.

Gongshi Bai1, Chames Kermi1, Henriette Stoy2, Carl J Schiltz3, Julien Bacal1, Angela M Zaino4, M Kyle Hadden4, Brandt F Eichman3, Massimo Lopes2, Karlene A Cimprich5.   

Abstract

DNA replication stress can stall replication forks, leading to genome instability. DNA damage tolerance pathways assist fork progression, promoting replication fork reversal, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), and repriming. In the absence of the fork remodeler HLTF, forks fail to slow following replication stress, but underlying mechanisms and cellular consequences remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that HLTF-deficient cells fail to undergo fork reversal in vivo and rely on the primase-polymerase PRIMPOL for repriming, unrestrained replication, and S phase progression upon limiting nucleotide levels. By contrast, in an HLTF-HIRAN mutant, unrestrained replication relies on the TLS protein REV1. Importantly, HLTF-deficient cells also exhibit reduced double-strand break (DSB) formation and increased survival upon replication stress. Our findings suggest that HLTF promotes fork remodeling, preventing other mechanisms of replication stress tolerance in cancer cells. This remarkable plasticity of the replication fork may determine the outcome of replication stress in terms of genome integrity, tumorigenesis, and response to chemotherapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication, replication stress response, fork reversal, HLTF, PRIMPOL, REV1, DNA damage tolerance, translesion synthesis, ATR inhibition, replication catastrophe

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32442397      PMCID: PMC7305998          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  82 in total

1.  SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication.

Authors:  Rémy Bétous; Aaron C Mason; Robert P Rambo; Carol E Bansbach; Akosua Badu-Nkansah; Bianca M Sirbu; Brandt F Eichman; David Cortez
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Pavel Moudry; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; MyungHee Lee; Robert Strauss; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Building up and breaking down: mechanisms controlling recombination during replication.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Barnabas Szakal
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 8.250

4.  HLTF gene silencing in human colon cancer.

Authors:  Helen R Moinova; Wei-Dong Chen; Lanlan Shen; Dominic Smiraglia; Joseph Olechnowicz; Lakshmeswari Ravi; Lakshmi Kasturi; Lois Myeroff; Christoph Plass; Ramon Parsons; John Minna; James K V Willson; Sylvan B Green; Jean-Pierre Issa; Sanford D Markowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) in cancer: loss of function or oncomorphic conversion of a tumor suppressor?

Authors:  Ludovic Dhont; Céline Mascaux; Alexandra Belayew
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability.

Authors:  Lisa A Poole; David Cortez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.250

7.  Polyubiquitinated PCNA recruits the ZRANB3 translocase to maintain genomic integrity after replication stress.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Amitabh V Nimonkar; Yiduo Hu; Ildiko Hajdu; Yathish Jagadheesh Achar; Lior Izhar; Sarah A Petit; Britt Adamson; John C Yoon; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; David M Livingston; Lajos Haracska; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Role of yeast Rad5 and its human orthologs, HLTF and SHPRH in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Ildiko Unk; Ildikó Hajdú; András Blastyák; Lajos Haracska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-21

10.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  35 in total

1.  CARM1 regulates replication fork speed and stress response by stimulating PARP1.

Authors:  Marie-Michelle Genois; Jean-Philippe Gagné; Takaaki Yasuhara; Jessica Jackson; Sneha Saxena; Marie-France Langelier; Ivan Ahel; Mark T Bedford; John M Pascal; Alessandro Vindigni; Guy G Poirier; Lee Zou
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.

Authors:  Sarah A Joseph; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Jen-Wei Huang; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-15

3.  Single Molecular Resolution to Monitor DNA Replication Fork Dynamics upon Stress by DNA Fiber Assay.

Authors:  Wenpeng Liu
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-12-20

4.  PCAF-Mediated Histone Acetylation Promotes Replication Fork Degradation by MRE11 and EXO1 in BRCA-Deficient Cells.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Ji-Hye Choi; Hyun Goo Woo; Blerta Xhemalce; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Critical DNA damaging pathways in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jake A Kloeber; Zhenkun Lou
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 6.  To skip or not to skip: choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage.

Authors:  Annabel Quinet; Stephanie Tirman; Emily Cybulla; Alice Meroni; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  PRIMPOL ready, set, reprime!

Authors:  Stephanie Tirman; Emily Cybulla; Annabel Quinet; Alice Meroni; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Abraxas suppresses DNA end resection and limits break-induced replication by controlling SLX4/MUS81 chromatin loading in response to TOP1 inhibitor-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Xiao Wu; Bin Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  The Replication Stress Response on a Narrow Path Between Genomic Instability and Inflammation.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 10.  Translesion synthesis inhibitors as a new class of cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors:  Seema M Patel; Radha Charan Dash; M Kyle Hadden
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 6.206

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.