Literature DB >> 22133225

Artificial selection reveals heritable variation for developmental instability.

Ashley J R Carter1, David Houle.   

Abstract

Fluctuating (nondirectional) asymmetry (FA) of bilaterally paired structures on a symmetrical organism is commonly used to assay the developmental instability (DI) caused by environmental or genetic factors. Although evidence for natural selection to reduce FA has been reported, evidence that FA (and by extension DI) is heritable is weak. We report the use of artificial selection to demonstrate heritable variation in the fluctuating asymmetry of interlandmark distances within the wing in an outbred population of Drosophila melanogaster. Our estimates for the heritability of FA range from 0% to 1% and result in estimates for the heritability of DI as large as 20%, comparable to values typical for life-history traits. These values indicate the existence of evolutionarily relevant genetic variation for DI and the effectiveness of selection for reduced FA suggests that natural selection has not fixed all the genetic variants that would improve developmental stability in these populations.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133225     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01393.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  15 in total

1.  Behavioral idiosyncrasy reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability.

Authors:  Julien F Ayroles; Sean M Buchanan; Chelsea O'Leary; Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria; Jennifer K Grenier; Andrew G Clark; Daniel L Hartl; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic structure of phenotypic robustness in the collaborative cross mouse diallel panel.

Authors:  P N Gonzalez; M Pavlicev; P Mitteroecker; F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; R A Spritz; R S Marcucio; B Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Influence of Inbreeding on Female Mate Choice in Two Species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Amberle A McKee; Shanna M Newton; Ashley J R Carter
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.309

5.  A Multivariate Genome-Wide Association Study of Wing Shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  William Pitchers; Jessica Nye; Eladio J Márquez; Alycia Kowalski; Ian Dworkin; David Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Making quantitative morphological variation from basic developmental processes: Where are we? The case of the Drosophila wing.

Authors:  Alexis Matamoro-Vidal; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; David Houle
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Lack of response to artificial selection on developmental stability of partial wing shape components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Masahiro Tsujino; Kazuo H Takahashi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 8.  'Particle genetics': treating every cell as unique.

Authors:  Gaël Yvert
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Single-cell phenomics reveals intra-species variation of phenotypic noise in yeast.

Authors:  Gaël Yvert; Shinsuke Ohnuki; Satoru Nogami; Yasutaka Imanaga; Steffen Fehrmann; Joseph Schacherer; Yoshikazu Ohya
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2013-07-03

10.  Non-adaptive phenotypic evolution of the endangered carnivore Lycaon pictus.

Authors:  Charles T T Edwards; Gregory S A Rasmussen; Philip Riordan; Franck Courchamp; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.