Literature DB >> 16050100

Evolution of the environmental component of the phenotypic variance: stabilizing selection in changing environments and the cost of homogeneity.

Xu-Sheng Zhang1, William G Hill.   

Abstract

Quantitative traits show abundant genetic, environmental, and phenotypic variance, yet if they are subject to stabilizing selection for an optimal phenotype, both the genetic and environmental components are expected to decline. The mechanisms that determine the level and maintenance of phenotypic variance are not yet fully understood. While there has been extensive study of mechanisms maintaining genetic variability, it has generally been assumed that environmental variance is not dependent on the genotype and therefore not subject to change. However, accumulating data suggest that the environmental variance is under some degree of genetic control. In this study, it is assumed accordingly that both the genotypic value (i.e., mean phenotypic value) and the variance of phenotypic value given genotypic value depend on the genotype. Two models are investigated as potentially able to explain the protected maintenance of environmental variance of quantitative traits under stabilizing selection. One is varying environment among generations, such that both the optimal phenotype and the strength of the stabilizing selection vary between generations. The other is the cost of homogeneity, which is based on an assumption of an engineering cost of minimizing variability in development. It is shown that a small homogeneity cost is enough to maintain the observed levels of environmental variance, whereas a large amount of temporal variation in the optimal phenotype and the strength of selection would be necessary.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

1.  Genetic Control of Environmental Variation of Two Quantitative Traits of Drosophila melanogaster Revealed by Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Peter Sørensen; Gustavo de los Campos; Fabio Morgante; Trudy F C Mackay; Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Phenotypic plasticity of body size in a temperate population of Drosophila melanogaster: when the temperature-size rule does not apply.

Authors:  Jean R David; Hélène Legout; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 3.  Developments in statistical analysis in quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Daniel Sorensen
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Increase in quantitative variation after exposure to environmental stresses and/or introduction of a major mutation: G x E interaction and epistasis or canalization?

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Riding across the selection landscape: fitness consequences of annual variation in reproductive characteristics.

Authors:  Raymond L Tremblay; James D Ackerman; Maria-Eglée Pérez
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Selection for environmental variation: a statistical analysis and power calculations to detect response.

Authors:  Noelia Ibáñez-Escriche; Daniel Sorensen; Rasmus Waagepetersen; Agustín Blasco
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Heritable environmental variance causes nonlinear relationships between traits: application to birth weight and stillbirth of pigs.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; William G Hill; Egbert F Knol
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Quantifying the decanalizing effects of spontaneous mutations in rhabditid nematodes.

Authors:  Charles F Baer
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Spontaneous mutations decrease sensitivity of gene expression to random environmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Dee R Denver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.