Literature DB >> 28634889

The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness.

Sarah D'Amour1, Jelte E Bos2,3, Behrang Keshavarz4,5.   

Abstract

Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) is a well-known sensation in virtual environments and simulators, typically characterized by a variety of symptoms such as pallor, sweating, dizziness, fatigue, and/or nausea. Numerous methods to reduce VIMS have been previously introduced; however, a reliable countermeasure is still missing. In the present study, the effect of airflow and seat vibration to alleviate VIMS was investigated. Eighty-two participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups (airflow, vibration, combined airflow and vibration, and control) and then exposed to a 15 min long video of a bicycle ride shot from first-person view. VIMS was measured using the Fast Motion Sickness Scale (FMS) and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Results showed that the exposure of airflow significantly reduced VIMS, whereas the presence of seat vibration, in contrast, did not have an impact on VIMS. Additionally, we found that females reported higher FMS scores than males, however, this sex difference was not found in the SSQ scores. Our findings demonstrate that airflow can be an effective and easy-to-apply technique to reduce VIMS in virtual environments and simulators, while vibration applied to the seat is not a successful method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airflow; Gender; Motion sickness; Simulator sickness; Vection; Vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634889     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5009-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Autogenic-feedback training exercise is superior to promethazine for control of motion sickness symptoms.

Authors:  P S Cowings; W B Toscano
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Postural instability induced by virtual reality exposure: development of a certification protocol.

Authors:  R S Kennedy; K M Stanney
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Interact       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.353

3.  On the causes of diurnal body temperature rhythm in man, with reference to observations during voyage.

Authors:  K OGATA; T SASAKI
Journal:  Jpn J Physiol       Date:  1963-02-15

Review 4.  Motion sickness: advances in pathogenesis, prediction, prevention, and treatment.

Authors:  Avi Shupak; Carlos R Gordon
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2006-12

5.  Passive restraint reduces visually induced motion sickness in older adults.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Alison C Novak; Lawrence J Hettinger; Thomas A Stoffregen; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2017-02-02

6.  A survey of the occurrence of motion sickness amongst passengers at sea.

Authors:  A Lawther; M J Griffin
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1988-05

7.  Sex differences in visual performance and postural sway precede sex differences in visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Frank Koslucher; Eric Haaland; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pleasant music as a countermeasure against visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Console video games, postural activity, and motion sickness during passive restraint.

Authors:  Chih-Hui Chang; Wu-Wen Pan; Fu-Chen Chen; Thomas A Stoffregen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model.

Authors:  J T Reason
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Pilot Study on EEG-Based Evaluation of Visually Induced Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Ran Liu; Miao Xu; Yanzhen Zhang; Eli Peli; Alex D Hwang
Journal:  J Imaging Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 0.400

2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of tactile stimulation in vection research.

Authors:  Lars Kooijman; Houshyar Asadi; Shady Mohamed; Saeid Nahavandi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: Consensus Document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society.

Authors:  Yoon-Hee Cha; John F Golding; Behrang Keshavarz; Joseph Furman; Ji-Soo Kim; Jose A Lopez-Escamez; Måns Magnusson; Bill J Yates; Ben D Lawson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 5.  Virtual Reality Exercise for Anxiety and Depression: A Preliminary Review of Current Research in an Emerging Field.

Authors:  Nan Zeng; Zachary Pope; Jung Eun Lee; Zan Gao
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Chewing gum reduces visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Mara Kaufeld; Katharina De Coninck; Jennifer Schmidt; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  How feelings of unpleasantness develop during the progression of motion sickness symptoms.

Authors:  A J C Reuten; S A E Nooij; J E Bos; J B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Joint and individual effectiveness of galvanic cutaneous stimulation and tactile stimulation at decreasing Simulator Adaptation Syndrome.

Authors:  Germán Gálvez-García; Javier Albayay; Fernando Fonseca; Claudio Bascour-Sandoval
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.