Literature DB >> 34921337

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of tactile stimulation in vection research.

Lars Kooijman1, Houshyar Asadi2, Shady Mohamed2, Saeid Nahavandi2.   

Abstract

Vection is classically defined as the illusory perception of self-motion induced via visual stimuli. The utility of vection research lies in its potential to enhance simulation fidelity, as measured through presence, and reduce the probability that motion sickness symptoms occur. Studies have shown a multimodal interaction of various sensory systems in facilitating vection, and the utility of co-stimulating some of these sensory systems along with the presentation of visual stimuli have been reviewed. However, a review on the use of tactile stimulation in vection research appears to be missing from literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the current methodologies, and outcomes, of tactile stimulation in vection research. We searched for articles through EBSCOHost, Scopus and Web of Science. Studies were included only if they detailed an experiment on the effect of tactile stimulation on vection. Twenty-four studies were obtained and distilled in tabular form. Eighteen studies contained sufficient information to be included in a meta-analysis. We identified that tactile stimulation has mostly been applied in the form of vibrational stimulation to the feet. Furthermore, tactile stimulation is most effective when it is presented in a temporally congruent manner to other sensory cues, whereas tactile stimulation as a unisensory stimulus does not appear to be effective in eliciting vection. We discuss the need for more qualitative research to reduce methodological inhomogeneities and recommend future research in tactile-mediated vection to investigate stimulation to the torso and investigate the use of forces as a tactile stimulus.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cue-integration; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Tactile stimulation; Vection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34921337     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02400-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  25 in total

1.  Visual and non-visual cues in the perception of linear self-motion.

Authors:  L R Harris; M Jenkin; D C Zikovitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Jelte E Bos; Behrang Keshavarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Integration of visual and tactile information in reproduction of traveled distance.

Authors:  Jan Churan; Johannes Paul; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Back to Reality: The Use of the Presence Questionnaire for Measurement of Fidelity in Simulation.

Authors:  Dana E Brackney; Kimberly Priode
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 6.  Neuropsychological Approaches to Visually-Induced Vection: an Overview and Evaluation of Neuroimaging and Neurophysiological Studies.

Authors:  Stefan Berti; Behrang Keshavarz
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.286

7.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

8.  Tactile stimulation can suppress visual perception.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Vestibular and Multi-Sensory Influences Upon Self-Motion Perception and the Consequences for Human Behavior.

Authors:  Zelie Britton; Qadeer Arshad
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Questionnaire Measures and Physiological Correlates of Presence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Simone Grassini; Karin Laumann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhanced vection in older adults: Evidence for age-related effects in multisensory vection experiences.

Authors:  Brandy Murovec; Julia Spaniol; Jennifer L Campos; Behrang Keshavarz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.695

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.