Literature DB >> 28633401

Biomedical text mining for research rigor and integrity: tasks, challenges, directions.

Halil Kilicoglu1.   

Abstract

An estimated quarter of a trillion US dollars is invested in the biomedical research enterprise annually. There is growing alarm that a significant portion of this investment is wasted because of problems in reproducibility of research findings and in the rigor and integrity of research conduct and reporting. Recent years have seen a flurry of activities focusing on standardization and guideline development to enhance the reproducibility and rigor of biomedical research. Research activity is primarily communicated via textual artifacts, ranging from grant applications to journal publications. These artifacts can be both the source and the manifestation of practices leading to research waste. For example, an article may describe a poorly designed experiment, or the authors may reach conclusions not supported by the evidence presented. In this article, we pose the question of whether biomedical text mining techniques can assist the stakeholders in the biomedical research enterprise in doing their part toward enhancing research integrity and rigor. In particular, we identify four key areas in which text mining techniques can make a significant contribution: plagiarism/fraud detection, ensuring adherence to reporting guidelines, managing information overload and accurate citation/enhanced bibliometrics. We review the existing methods and tools for specific tasks, if they exist, or discuss relevant research that can provide guidance for future work. With the exponential increase in biomedical research output and the ability of text mining approaches to perform automatic tasks at large scale, we propose that such approaches can support tools that promote responsible research practices, providing significant benefits for the biomedical research enterprise.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28633401      PMCID: PMC6291799          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  105 in total

1.  Bridging semantics and syntax with graph algorithms-state-of-the-art of extracting biomedical relations.

Authors:  Yuan Luo; Özlem Uzuner; Peter Szolovits
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction.

Authors:  Yoko Mizuta; Anna Korhonen; Tony Mullen; Nigel Collier
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 3.  Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results.

Authors:  Panayiotis A Kyzas; Despina Denaxa-Kyza; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from full-text biomedical articles.

Authors:  Catherine Blake
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Automatically classifying the role of citations in biomedical articles.

Authors:  Shashank Agarwal; Lisha Choubey; Hong Yu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

6.  The structural and content aspects of abstracts versus bodies of full text journal articles are different.

Authors:  K Bretonnel Cohen; Helen L Johnson; Karin Verspoor; Christophe Roeder; Lawrence E Hunter
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials.

Authors:  Kerry Dwan; Douglas G Altman; Mike Clarke; Carrol Gamble; Julian P T Higgins; Jonathan A C Sterne; Paula R Williamson; Jamie J Kirkham
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.

Authors:  Lucy Turner; Larissa Shamseer; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth F Schulz; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-29

10.  The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Luke Holman; Rob Lanfear; Andrew T Kahn; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  19 in total

1.  Towards a characterization of apparent contradictions in the biomedical literature using context analysis.

Authors:  Graciela Rosemblat; Marcelo Fiszman; Dongwook Shin; Halil Kilicoglu
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature.

Authors:  Halil Kilicoglu; Graciela Rosemblat; Mario Malicki; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Hollis Mills; Lisa V Grossman; Andrew Goldstein; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Cardioinformatics: the nexus of bioinformatics and precision cardiology.

Authors:  Bohdan B Khomtchouk; Diem-Trang Tran; Kasra A Vand; Matthew Might; Or Gozani; Themistocles L Assimes
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Three Dimensions of Reproducibility in Natural Language Processing.

Authors:  K Bretonnel Cohen; Jingbo Xia; Pierre Zweigenbaum; Tiffany J Callahan; Orin Hargraves; Foster Goss; Nancy Ide; Aurélie Névéol; Cyril Grouin; Lawrence E Hunter
Journal:  LREC Int Conf Lang Resour Eval       Date:  2018-05

6.  Rediscovering Don Swanson: the Past, Present and Future of Literature-Based Discovery.

Authors:  Neil R Smalheiser
Journal:  J Data Inf Sci       Date:  2017-12

7.  Combining Literature Mining and Machine Learning for Predicting Biomedical Discoveries.

Authors:  Balu Bhasuran
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  BioBERT and Similar Approaches for Relation Extraction.

Authors:  Balu Bhasuran
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

9.  Toward assessing clinical trial publications for reporting transparency.

Authors:  Halil Kilicoglu; Graciela Rosemblat; Linh Hoang; Sahil Wadhwa; Zeshan Peng; Mario Malički; Jodi Schneider; Gerben Ter Riet
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Artificial Intelligence Clinical Evidence Engine for Automatic Identification, Prioritization, and Extraction of Relevant Clinical Oncology Research.

Authors:  Fernando Suarez Saiz; Corey Sanders; Rick Stevens; Robert Nielsen; Michael Britt; Leemor Yuravlivker; Anita M Preininger; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.